Wings 2, Sharks 1 (SO)

It’s ridiculous how good it feels to say this: three wins in a row for the Wings. It’s easy to feel they’ve turned the corner.

Osgood: Another strong game from him. 33 saves and and two in the shootout made for one of his better nights this season. He was tested to a fair degree by the Sharks’ forward corps and was about as steady as it gets. The Sharks’ goal looked a little weak, but whatever. He should have gotten one of the game’s stars.

Draper-Helm-Eaves: In my opinion, flat out the best line throughout the game. No other unit created problems for the Sharks like this group did. No other unit showed the hustle those three did. Eaves was the only one of the three that got a point, but it was Helm’s efforts earlier in the play that created the conditions that led to Zetterberg’s tying goal. Heck of a game for those guys.

Eaves: More specifically, Patrick has been exponentially better since he scored that goal in Edmonton. His confidence is through the roof and it’s produced an entirely different player from the one that was so underwhelming earlier in the season. Great to see.

Bertuzzi: In contrast, he seems to be on the downward slope of some kind of bell curve. He’d been getting better and looked poised to pull out of his early season slump, but suddenly, he’s flubbing glorious chances worse than ever. He had a perfect, threaded feed from Stuart last night that would have been a gimme goal for anyone with a stick, but he managed to fumble the puck completely. His hands seem to be made of cinder blocks.

Leino: Few players looked better on an individual basis last night than Ville did. I guess the message from his benching was slow to arrive, but now that it has? He looked like a man possessed. He was creating chances all night and nearly had  couple goals. Great to see. Let’s hope it continues.

Ericsson: Another weak night for young Big Rig. He very spectacularly fell over just prior to the Sharks goal and left Osgood out to dry due that sudden brain cramp on the whole skating thing. Granted the Sharks’ transition on that play was fast, but Jonny was just a little too caught off guard.

After Zetterberg scored in the shootout, they showed a shot of the bench, which included video of Ericsson’s response. It was excessively celebratory. He was obviously relieved. I hope he’s motivated to come out Saturday with a stronger performance. He’s obviously reverted to your typical young defenseman learning curve (remember Fischer’s growth?), which is fine, but a let down after his torrid start as an NHLer.

Penalty kill: It’s suddenly looking world-beating. Cool, huh?

Zetterberg: His regulation goal is apparently “controversial” because the puck was under Nabokov’s leg for a split second and the ref had the whistle to his mouth. I figure if he was going to blow it dead, he would have waived it off. No need to get riled up about it, folks.

As for his shootout goal: wow. About time he tried something new. He’s usually either got a shot-to-crest or that stupid Forsbergian move under his belt. This time? He came in with speed at Nabokov’s left. He then slammed on the breaks and pulled the puck across to his forehand, managing to sneak it just inside the left post. Beautiful goal. He’s another guy that’s been very strong lately.

Next up: a must-win over the flailing Toronto Maple Leafs on Saturday. Why a must win? Aside from the fact that the Leafs suck this year, it’s the Legends Game, at which Steve Yzerman will be honored along with his other HHOF inductees. No better way to honor The Captain than by beating the Leafs.

Make it four, guys.

Filed under: 2009-2010, Game Reports

Tags:

Comments

  1. John W. says:

    "He should have gotten one of the game’s stars."

    That's what I though. Was very suprised when they said it was Eaves, Thornton, Zetterberg. I was thinking Nabokov, Zetterberg, Osgood. Any goalie that faces over 30 shots and allows 1 goal should be a lock.

    Also, regarding the shootout, Osgood actually looked good for once, amazing! Of course the fact that the Sharks' second shooter was Ryane Clowe helped. Dating back to last year, the guy has scored 1 goal in 24 games.

  2. Kyle says:

    I disagree — Stuart's pass to Bertuzzi was not a "perfect, threaded feed." FSN broke out the high-speed camera on that one and the puck was wobbly and on edge from the moment it left Stuart's stick. Not much he could do with it, you either hope that you get most of your blade on it or settle it down and shoot, but I don't think he had time for that.

     

    That said, I'm pretty much done defending Bertuzzi. He's getting more chances than anyone else, but he's not going to win anyone over until he starts capitalizing. I still think he will, but it would be nice to see him catch a break on a play like that.

  3. Megan Saler says:

    John,

     

    I agree about stars. #1- Ozzie (winning goaltender), #2 – Nabokov, #3 – Zetter

  4. Garth says:

    I also think the "controversy" over Zetterberg's goal is laughable. The puck was under his pad for a half-second so the whistle should've been blown?!? It was mentioned on both the TSN and The Score highlights. How come there was no uproar about the goal when Osgood has the puck under him and he was pushed into the net, had the puck knocked loose and then put the puck in?

  5. John W. says:

    In my mind that Zetterberg goal is exactly why the "intent to blow the whistle" rule is moronic. If you are going to blow the whistle, and the puck ends up in the net, then it's a good thing you didn't blow it yet because you obviously were wrong about blowing it dead. Obviously this doesn't mean every goal banged in from under a goalie should count, but in the cases where the ref loses sight but isn't sure where it is, he should let it go. When he clearly knows that the puck is covered, then the intent to blow the whistle applies, but not when he's guessing. Amazingly, the ref actually got it right this time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>