Wings 5, Canucks 4

Yay, road win, yay. Today does feel much better (despite 6 or fewer hours of sleep) after a Wings win than it would have after another loss, eh?

Turnaround? Already seeing some talk from pundits about how this could be the game we look to as when the Wings turned things around. It’s, uh, a little early to tell on that and since they’ve had a couple other strong games this season that didn’t result in sustained not-sucking, I’m going to withhold judgment. At least until after tomorrow night’s game.

Guard change? Yes, Osgood was terrible last night and, yes, Jimmy Howard did his best NHL-level Goalie impression, but as with the turnaround talk, let’s reserve judgment until he’s played at least one more game (which’ll be tomorrow night, by the way).

Osbad: I, like Triple Deke, use that ironically. But it certainly applies when describing him last night. What the heck happened? Two weak goals on four shots? Osgood’s been solid overall so far this season, but that “performance” had my brain shooting out flashbacks to last year. Not cool. Get your head on straight, Chris, and come back Saturday with some steadyness, please. Still supportive, but it’s tough love time.

The other guy: Jimmy Howard is capable of playing the goaltending position at the National Hockey League level. For roughly two and three quarters periods, that is. He had zero chance on the two he did allow and, contrary to the Vancouver Sun reporter who must have watched the game on a fuzzy black-and-white TV in the Yukon with no sound, made some pretty spectacular saves to keep the Canucks from making things difficult for the Wings.

If he can come in like that on a regular start, he may just have a future with Detroit after all.

Datsyuk: Good to have you back, Pavel. More please.

Top line: Best unit on the ice for the Wings, which is exactly as it should be. Homer was a beast, Zetterberg (weak breakaway effort in the first aside) was stellar and Datsyuk was dominant.

Demolition Man: Holmstrom was personally responsible for three of five goals, though he only got two points. Heck of an outing.

Scary: The Ryan Johnson incident was terrifying. He’s fortunate he was able to get his head ducked and hit the boards with mostly his shoulder or the hockey headlines today could have be as dark as we’ve ever seen them. Totally freak play. Glad to read he’s relatively okay tonight (has a concussion).

The Stuart Board: I saw some blather about the boarding call on Stuart last night. Apparently, it was the same as the Ruutu/Tucker hit. Except that it wasn’t. It was a hockey play on Stuart’s part and a dive on Shirokov’s.

Schneider: Man, that guy still has a cannon. My wife (big Schneider fan) said last night, “You know, I love Rafi, but he can not shoot the puck like that.” No argument from me. No doubt that the Wings’ power play misses that shot. (no offense, Rafi. I think you’re a great passer.)

BertuzziWatch: Someday, he’ll score. It may be in an alumni game or something, but it’ll happen.

Shiny Forehead: Williams scored, but it was only because Luongo was blinded by the light bouncing off that thing. And because of Filppula’s cross-crease feed. And because anyone with a stick could have potted that one.

Abdelkader: Was it really worth sitting Helm for Justin, coach? I barely noticed him. Maybe that’s because he was only on the ice for 7:14.

May: I did notice him. Once. When he fought Tanner Glass (awesome name, Full House). After that, not so much. He only cracked 5:00 in TOI (5:17).

+/-: The list of guys in the minuses is interesting: Cleary (-2), Stuart (-2), Bertuzzi (-2), Filppula (-2). So that second line could obviously use some defensive practice together. (UpdateJohn helpfully points out that these were the guys on the ice for Osgood’s troubles. Never mind.) Who wasn’t on the list? Ericsson (+1) and Lebda (+1). They weren’t so bad, which is encouraging. Still, I’d like to see them split up.

Tighten down: The Osgood Crapfest at the start skewed things a lot, so forget those. The rest of the game, though, wasn’t the Wings’ best defensively. They pulled out the win on offense and goaltending, not offense, defense and goaltending, which is what they’ll need over the long haul. Too much freedom allowed to Vancouver, which resulted in some of those great saves on Jimmy’s part. Next on the list, guys? Tightening down defensively.

Coming up: The Wings fly on to Edmonton for a meeting tomorrow night. Should be fun.

Filed under: 2009-2010, Game Reports

Tags:

Comments

  1. John W. says:

    "The list of guys in the minuses is interesting: Cleary (-2), Stuart (-2), Bertuzzi (-2), Filppula (-2). So that second line could obviously use some defensive practice together….The Osgood Crapfest at the start skewed things a lot, so forget those."

    Yeah you can forget those minuses because those were the guys on the ice for both of Ozzie's horrid goals. I don't blame skaters for allowing shots that the goalie is supposed to save.

    I am very impressed with that win. With the way things had been going it would have been very easy after the 2 weak Ozzie goals and some early Luongo brilliance for them to just say "here we go again" and essentially fold up shop for the rest of the game. But they never gave up and kept coming at the 'nucks and it paid off big time.

    I know I keep saying it, but I'll say it again, Bertuzzi is gonna have a big game very soon. If he can get one in and get some confidence, look out.

    As for the Helm/Abdelkader scenario, why don't they send Justin back to GR? He gets very little out of 7 minutes a night. And not only do I not want to see Helm scratched, I wanna see him on the 3rd line instead of Draper. Let the kid loose and see what he can do.

    Let's just hope the Wings can escape Edmonton w/o a flu epidemic. They've been hit had by it for a good 2 weeks now, and had another player (Visnovsky) leave the game last night with it. That's the last thing we need.

  2. Matt Saler says:

    Yeah you can forget those minuses because those were the guys on the ice for both of Ozzie’s horrid goals. I don’t blame skaters for allowing shots that the goalie is supposed to save.

    Good point. Brain cramp on my part not to put 2 and 2 together…

    … to just say “here we go again” and essentially fold up shop for the rest of the game.

    Exactly. That is a change and a departure from their other semi-decent games this season. I want to think it means a turnaround, but I'll still holding off.

    I just hope Todd keeps at it and doesn't saw, "Screw it." They need him to get going and it does seem close…

    I'm with you on Abdelkader. If he's going to get such limited ice time, he'd be much better off in GR. The Wings want their youth to lead them out of this, but he can't exactly do that with 7 minutes.

    The swine flu's a definite concern. Wings'll want to stay out of scrums, I think.

  3. Natalie says:

    Love the "shiny forehead" reference to Jason Williams.  That's hilarious and so true.

    Also, you echo my sentiments entirely with your take on Todd Bertuzzi scoring eventually–it HAS to happen sometime.  How many chances has he had?

  4. John W. says:

    "Wings’ll want to stay out of scrums, I think."

    No doubt, maybe the league should make face-washing a major penalty for this season…

  5. Marlon says:

    I know Brad May didn't log many minutes last night but I thought he had a pretty good game. In the first period he flew up the wing and got a pass off to a breaking Maltby who made Luongo have to make a pretty quick save.

    He looked like Helm in the playoffs last year whenever he was on the ice, hitting whoever he saw and sometimes circling back to hit the same guy over again. Granted he only had 5 minutes of ice time to work with, I think he made the best of it.

  6. Joe 35 says:

    Not too mention May stood up for Stuart after Glass creamed him on that icing call. With the H1N1 virus appearing in some areas of the league (Colorado, Edmonton, etc.) it would be a 'joke' to see players wear those blue masks over their mouths. However you couldn't blame 'em for being to careful. Plus to add to this great job by Howie, Ozzie not so much.

  7. Garth says:

    "They pulled out the win on offense and goaltending, not offense, defense and goaltending, which is what they’ll need over the long haul."

    Well put, but at the same time I'd rather win because of offense and goaltending than lose because of offense and defense or because of offense, defense and goaltending.

    And as poor as Ozzie was, it allowed us to OVERCOME a two goal deficit for once rather than SQUANDER a two goal lead…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>