Game 3: Wings 2, Penguins 4

Briefly:

… The Wings did not come out with the necessary fire in this one. Pittsburgh controlled the play for much of the first ten minutes, a stretch in which they scored a goal, and had numerous chances. Zetterberg’s goal at 6:19 was a great one, but it took until midway through the period before the Wings looked to get their feet under them.

… They started to assert themselves better at 11:33 after going on the power play and cycling the puck following some initial trouble getting set up. Some great passing led to Franzen’s goal, and made it 2-1.

… A couple minutes later, the officials blew it when they forgot how to count. After the Pens player got back on the bench, the pressure in the Wings’ end continued and Dan Cleary took a penalty. The Pens scored a little over a minute later. Now, the Wings didn’t have to take that penalty, and they didn’t have to allow that goal, but if the officials make the right call on the too many men situation, that whole sequence never happens, and maybe we have a different game.

… That said, the Wings didn’t rise to the occassion. They played a great second period in terms of statistical dominance, but there were far too many blown chances when it came down to it. Too many missed passes, too many blocked shots, and at least one hit post. They got a little taste of what the Pens experienced in Games 1 and 2. Had they kept up the pressure, they might have finally cracked the Pens.

… But they didn’t. In the third period, they had just three shots to Pittsburghj’s ten. That’s simply pathetic.

… They were fatally weak at clearing the puck from their own zone, and it really killed them on the power play following the Ericsson penalty. Pittsburgh basically dominated the zone for the full 1:30 or so of power play time leading up to the Gonchar goal. It felt inevitable.

… To their credit, the Wings stepped it up after that in an effort to tie it up again, but they couldn’t compete with both Pittsburgh and the officials, who let everything go, no matter how ridiculous. The biggest one for me was the trip at the blueline that caused the turnover leading to Talbot’s empty-netter. We’ll never know if the Wings would have been able to keep it in had the Pens kept it legal there, because the officials were too terrified of making a call that would influence the game, that they let the Pens get away with one that took away any miniscule chance the Wings had of tying it up.

… Just one last comment on the officiating: in Games 1 and 2, I was of the opinion that the officiating was awful both ways. Letting them play is a nice idea in concept, but in practice it just means the players gradually become too loose with the rules. Both teams were guilty of it in the first two games, with rampant interference being the most obvious of the play-to-play stuff. In Game 3, however, the officiating largely turned against the Wings.

Let me be clear: Detroit is not a team of perfect little angels, and I’m sure there were some things they didn’t get called for last night (I freely admit I was paying more attention to what the Pens were doing as far as penalizable offenses), but Pittsburgh truly got away with some really blatant crap last night. From tripping Ericsson in his own zone, to the high hit of interference on Helm in the final minutes, to the kicking of Osgood by Cooke, to the final uncalled trip to any dump-in involving Gill, not to mention the willful collusion on the the too many men situation.* If you’re going to call stuff like the Ericsson interference in the third, call it when the Pens do it too. It’s only fair.

Call it both ways, or don’t call it at all. That’s all I’d like.

… As for the Wings, the disappointing thing is they didn’t fight through the adversity offered by the officiating as well as the difficulty presented by an assertive Pittsbugh team. Individuals like Zetterberg, Franzen, Filppula and Helm had great games and put out enormous efforts, but much of the rest of the team fell short. The officiating is a talking point and a gripe, but not an excuse.

… That includes Chris Osgood, who was strong in places, but had a weakish game overall.

… Marian Hossa needs to start getting points, whether it be from goals or assists. He had a bad night last night, and hasn’t been the dominant player he ought to be all playoffs. The Wings need him to get over whatever is holding him back, and to show up to play tomorow night.

… Two examples of awful turnovers: Lidstrom’s to Crosby, and Helm’s to Crosby. Both times, Osgood bailed the culprits out.

… Detroit has to play its best game of the playoffs tomorrow night. It’s as much a must-win game as any they’ve faced this year.

*On the wide angle replay, you can see the center ice ref and linesmen watch the Pens player get off the ice, and then the ref makes an “eh” hand signal to the deep ref.

Filed under: 2008-2009, Game Reports, Playoffs

Tags:

Comments

  1. John W. says:

    "On the wide angle replay, you can see the center ice ref and linesmen watch the Pens player get off the ice, and then the ref makes an “eh” hand signal to the deep ref."

    Not only that, but according to the Mick in a short interview after the game with WDIV, the linesman that was standing right next to the Pens sixth man actually told him he had to get off the ice. I really hope that's not true, because if it is, it really says a lot…

  2. Ryan says:

    Really can't agree on Hossa.  I thought he was fine.  He was strong on the puck all night, got shots, and generated some chances.  He had two assists in game 2, by the way.  He leads the Wings in shots so far this series, for what it's worth, and he's been first or second in shots each game.  Now that he's playing with Filppula instead of Datsyuk, it's more of an uphill battle for him to generate offense, especially given how ineffective Holmstrom has been most of the time (although not all the time).  It's most noticeable on the power play, where Hossa's basically all alone on his unit.

     

     

  3. Megan Saler says:

    Not only that, but according to the Mick in a short interview after the game with WDIV, the linesman that was standing right next to the Pens sixth man actually told him he had to get off the ice.

     

    For the sake of the integrity (what little there is) of the Stanley Cup Finals, I sure hope that's not true. The refs were terrible last night, but if possible, I think the linesmen were worse. The icing calls…as if that rule wasn't confusing enough. They waived icing every time the Pens sent it down the ice and one of the Wings was within ten feet of being able to stop the puck. However, the Wings send it right through the feet of three different penguins on the same clear, and it's icing. Also, faceoff at the end of the game. Holmstrom gets pushed onto the puck and then someone lays on him, and for some reason the faceoff comes out of the zone? I guess technically Homer was touching it, but come on. He's not the one that caused the delay.

     

    The Wings should have played better. We know they can, and they've defeated Pittsburgh+Refs before (hello 2008). The officiating is not an excuse, but no one in their right mind can say that it did not directly effect the outcome of the game. The game winning goal was on a powerplay. I think it was intereference by the rulebook, the regular season and even the playoffs before the finals. But the fact is, they let that go in both ways in games 1 and 2, and for the pens in game 3. I agree, call it or don't, but at least make it fair.

     

    Then there's the PK. Or the lack thereof. It's embarrassing. How can we call ourselves the best defensive team when our PK is so porous? It's particularly bad when our second best and biggest defenseman is in the box. Ozzie has, in my opinion, been pretty good on the PK. The skaters need to be better at getting on the rebounds and clearing the puck. I know, no rebounds would be awesome. But let's be realistic, here. Half the shots, Oz can't see and depends on positioning. In those cases, it's not realistic to expect him to cover the puck. And even when he can see it, he's not gonna have the ability to hold onto it every time. The fact that he makes the first, second and sometimes third save is pretty darn good. He shouldn't be forced to make even a third save if the defense is on the puck.

     

    Overall, I think the Wings had a good game. The turnovers are a serious problem. Dastyuk needs to come back (from what we've seen and read, it's looking good for game 4). I'd prefer Draper over Samuelsson, but Abby will probably get the shaft. Alligator has scored twice, what's Sammy done? Leino is making good plays and has an assist, what's Sammy done? Hossa needs to have his standard game four. In fact, if he wants to go above and beyond (you know what I mean, though I won't say it), that's cool with me. Then, if he could be a huge player in game 5, that'd be wonderful. I'm gonna need some convincing that he's worth giving up 2 depth players, and these next two games are the perfect opportunity to prove it to the fans and to Holland.

     

    In the end, I really don't think Pittsburgh can win three more games against the mighty Wings. But I'd really prefer a shorter series. Better for the health of the fans. Less stress…better for my marriage, too.

  4. Marlon says:

    For the sake of the integrity (what little there is) of the Stanley Cup Finals, I sure hope that’s not true. The refs were terrible last night, but if possible, I think the linesmen were worse.

     

    This was mentioned on TSN today too, Pierre McGuire was all smug and laughing about it like usual, but yes there was another source on the official telling Eaton to get off the ice.

    I agree with your comment on the linesmen, and if I'm not mistaken its the linesmen that generally call the Too Many Men penalty too since they're in a better position to actually count everyone on the ice.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>