Game 3: @ Pittsburgh (2-0)

Update (7:20 PM): Bruce MacLeod thinks Samuelsson’s playing, and his reasoning is sound: Sammy did the pre-game soccer ball circle, and likely wouldn’t be doing that if he was injured or sick enough to miss the game. - Matt

Tonight the Finals move to Pittsburgh, where the Pens will try to halt the Wings’ progress after dropping the first two. This is a must-win game for both teams, and should involve the best hockey we’ve seen yet.

For Pittsburgh, it doesn’t get any bigger. They simply have to win tonight, or they’ll all but fall off that knife edge they’re treading. This has to be their best game of the playoffs. Some keys to the game for Pittsburgh:

Energy. They have to play with it. If they skate hard after the puck, they’ll be in better position to force bounces to go their way. This means they have to forecheck aggressively, backcheck aggressively, and defend aggressively.

Discipline. The officials have been letting just about everything go, but that doesn’t mean they won’t call stuff resembling the late-game antics Malkin pulled Sunday. The Pens need to keep their frustrations in check, and focus on responding to the Wings with a strong hockey game, not a strong argument in the case against their maturity.

Malkin, Crosby and Fleury. If Malkin’s pissed off, he needs to channel that into a dominant performnce. If Crosby is frustrated, he needs to find it in himself to break out of the shell put around him by Zetterberg. If he’s as great a player as they say, he’ll do it. And Fleury needs to get his head together and start making saves. He won’t have the excuse of the Joe’s bouncy boards tonight.

Bylsma won’t commit to any lineup changes yet. They used the same lines in practice.

For the Wings, this is a must-win game because they can’t let the Pens think they have  chance. As with the Pens, they have to play their best game of the playoffs so far. Keys to the game for Detroit:

Work ethic. Tireless effort tonight is going to be the key. The Wings have to dig deep and find a way to keep coming at the Pens in every zone, in every way. Hitting, skating, moving the puck. It can’t stop.

Depth. With the Pens getting the last change, the Wings’ depth becomes more important than ever. Bylsma’s likely to get his top guns out against Helm and/or Abdelkader with relative frequency, and so those guys will have to be at their absolute best. Their defensive abilities will be hugely important tonight.

Special teams. If penalties start getting called, Detroit needs to be ready to perform. The kill has to be perfect, as does the power play.

Samuelsson didn’t skate today, but there’s no word on whether he’s out or not. Draper practiced like he’s going to play, but that doesn’t mean a ton. He’s able to play, but will sit if Sammy’s able to go.  Datsyuk is out, again, but may be back for Game 4. I’ll believe it when I see it, “big improvement” or not.

Detroit hasn’t quite attained its “A” game yet in the series. Tonight’s the night that has to happen. If they play two games at their best, they could very well end this thing, assuming bounces don’t start going against them. Pittsburgh, as great as they are, can’t stop a Detroit team firing on all cylinders.

Oh, and read this even if you read nothing else today. Michigan needs two more wins, guys.

Filed under: 2008-2009, GameDay, Playoffs

Tags:

Comments

  1. Jason says:

    Detroit's probably going to have to be more dominant in the faceoff circle, too, more like they were in game 1. It felt like they let the Pens, and Crosby especially, win far too many in game 2, which let the Penguins too often dictate the pace of the play. That'll be just as important for Detroit, being on the road, to dictate the pace and keep the Pittsburgh fans out of it as much as they can. Plus having the puck more often from the drop should give Babs more opportunities to get his top guys on Malkin and Crosby to help out the Griffin lines–especially since you have to figure at this point Bylsma will be pretty much double shifting the two of them from the get-go.

    From a viewer standpoint, I hope the Versus broadcast does a better job of disguising the pro-Pens bias than what we witnessed on NBC Sunday night. After a whole game of listening to Olczyk and McGuire obsessing about phantom slashes and "subtle interference," I started to wonder when Detroit acquired Hal Gill. I thought maybe I missed some kind of Detroit-Penguins trade between games 1 and 2? No? Huh. Oh well.

    Of course I know tonight it'll be all about Malkin and his "energy and emotion" that he showed at the end of game 2. I'm sure they'll not dote, however, on the fact that he picked a fight with a rather unsuspecting Zetterberg, put on his purple Donatello Ninja Turtle mask, and tried to use his his stick comically as some kind of bo-staff. And then Hank still kicked his ass. I'd have suspended Malkin simply because he looked ridiculous. But yeah, something tells me that part won't come up in the broadcast–though maybe Jones and Engblom will call him out for it, since they're usually pretty good about that.

    The good thing is, Detroit's had so many great stories these playoffs, even NBC's Crosby/Malkin groupies have to talk positively about them once in awhile. Last year was great, but this year has something more memorable about it, I think, just in how they've battled through everything that they have, and the true team effort they've gotten from everyone.

    The perfect punctuation would be to close this one out in front of the hometown crowd; of course that means Pittsburgh has to find a way to win one, just hopefully not tonight. I'd like the security of a 3-0 series lead before I start planning to attend the parade…

  2. Drikfan says:

    "I hope the Versus broadcast does a better job of disguising the pro-Pens bias than what we witnessed on NBC Sunday night"

    Not to nitpick, but I think they have done their share of kissing Wing ass as well. Seems like every other sentence is something like "Thats what makes the wings so good" or "They are just so high skill" or whatever. Not that I really mind it as a wings fan, but fair is fair =)

  3. Jason says:

    Ha,

    yeah, Drikfan, I guess since there's only the two teams playing, it should be every other sentence, on average at least, something about one team and then something about the other. And I actually thought Game 1 they did a pretty decent job of that; my main issue with Game 2 was more with the way they seemed to be focusing on the things Detroit "was getting away with," when, two minutes later, Pittsburgh would get away with the same thing, or something worse, and nothing would be said about it. There was very little uproar from the broadcast crew over Gill's actual slash on Helm's breakaway in game 1, yet Hossa's phantom slash was referred to several times. If they want to gush over one team's skill or the other's in a general sense all game, that's fine–but when it comes to the actual action on the ice, they should strive for a more connotatively-neutral tone, particularly when the facts contradict what they say. Yeah, Detroit has gotten away with stuff, but Pittsburgh has had twice as many powerplays. And when Pittsburgh gets a break from the officiating, it seems more often the preferred language is "they're letting them play" (positive connotation) vs. Detroit's "getting away with" or "that should have been a penalty," etc. (negative connotation).

    That's why I miss Mick and Ken this time of the year; yeah, they 're definite homers in their general comments, but when it comes to what's actually happening on the ice, they're almost always even keeled and tell it how it is.

    It'd be interesting though to do a study and tally up the kind of comments (and non-comments) they make about both teams, in general and on specific plays, just to see what the reality is, and if my perceptions exceed my own biases, or if I'm just a typical sports fan who thinks everyone has it out for the team he or she likes. Ha. I doubt any significant, objective measure could made of it, but it's still fun to ponder.

    At any rate, I've said it before that a great broadcast team makes great events more memorable. But no matter how you cut it, the current crop of guys calling nationally broadcast hockey games seldom even brush up against competent.

    But then maybe I just miss Gary Thorne…?

  4. Matt Saler says:

    Jason,

    Dead on about faceoffs. A return to the lopsided results of Game 1 is key tonight, for sure, especially with the last change going to Pittsburgh.

    I'm with you on Versus as well (sorry Drikfan). In Game 1, they seemed to have some journalistic integrity. But in Game 2, their harping on the Hossa "slash" became truly ridiculous after about the fifth time they mentioned it and showed the one angle that was inconclusive.

    I'm sure we can expect some talk of Malkin, though a commentor at A2Y pointed out that the Pens didn't react all that favorably to his antics (relative to the pats on the back Hank got). I'd like to hear more about that.

    It'd be cool to win at home, but cooler to get it over with in 4, in some ways. If it has to be five, though, it's got to be after going up 3-0, or I'll be overly stressed between tonight and Thursday.

  5. John W. says:

    "But then maybe I just miss Gary Thorne…?"

    Amen, Jason, Amen. I always loved him and Bill Clement calling hockey games.

  6. Matt Saler says:

    Best Thorne line: "What a save! What a save! And Osgood has redeemed himself in Detroit!" (1998, 2-0 SO of Dallas after the Langenbrunner goal the game before). Other than that, he wasn't one of my favorites. But his voice does take me back…

  7. Garry says:

    Detroit has not played well in their defensive end all series. Hence, it finally caught up with them in tonight's loss. Pretty obvious.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>