Abject Incompetence

That’s one way to describe the officiating in Game 3. Horse shit is another, and if you’ve been a reader for a while, you know how I like to reserve that kind of language for times when I’m white hot livid.

The men in striped uniforms tonight put on a horrifying and disgusting display of stupidity and lack of judgment in virtually every way possible. From the linesmen blowing offsides calls or faceoff violations to referees all but making up calls to the final display of complete deficiency in the intelligence department: the early whistle on the tying goal. 

This isn’t just about the Wings losing. It’s been a problem all post-season and beyond around the NHL. There is a serious, serious lack of credibility as far as officials are concerned in this League and while the average sports fan may not notice it immediately, it’d certainly be a major turn off once they star to get into the game and actually care about a team. 

These men may be good men, but they are failing to do their jobs properly and it’s really damaging the sport. The NHL runs the risk of not only alienating new fans who were looking for a fair sport, but long-time fans who are simply fed up

Brad Watson’s early whistle tonight was an appalling show of bad judgment and may have cost the Wings a playoff game. Had it gone to overtime, it could have gone either way, but now we’ll never know. All because Watson wasn’t competent enough to keep the puck in his sight. 

I’ll go into more detail about the rest of the game later, discussing how the Wings could have avoided the situation with a better effort through 30. But for now, the cold, hard fact is they scored the tying goal with 1:04 left and could have taken this one in overtime despite the slow start except for one Brad Watson, incompetent referee.

Filed under: 2008-2009, Playoffs

Tags:

Comments

  1. Kyle says:

    I applaud you for keeping a level head..  I tried, but was not so lucky.

     

    More than the call, it just shows how second-rate hockey is.  The only of the major sports where it is possible for legitimate points to not be counted, because the ref blowing a play dead early (even though it was blown well after the puck went in, because he "intended" to blow it) is not on the ridiculously specific and not at all comprehensive list of things that are available to video review.

     

    There's no way Detroit doesn't get hosed on this kind of thing more than other teams in the league.  I'm just so fed up; this is just hopeless.

  2. Keith says:

    While the very quick whistle pissed me off I was more upset with the allowed head hunting of the ducks. Hossa clearly scored and the puck went in way before the whistle, and I know the play ends at intention of blowing the whistle and not the blow, but the 1 second difference between intention and the actual whistle showed he meant to blow it after Hossa touched it! I always thought the refs were unfair to Detroit but I didn't think they intended for us to lose, now I'm not sure!

    After the game though when the refs let the leagues dirtiest player (SI poll confirms) go after Datsyuk or Getzlaf after Franzen, it makes me question if they really care about protecting the games stars. Crosby is given a 3 foot bubble and Ovechkin is handled like hes an infant, where is basic protection for 13, 40 and 93?

    I missed the Ducks sencond goal so I'm going off a FSN highlight but was that goalie interferrence? I felt Ozzie could of caught the puck in the air but was shoved by whoever was in front of him! I know for sure that Holmstrom would have been called on that. This really is frustrating. This game was stolen and the refs are losing control of the series quickly. I really think in the offseason we need to acquire a guy who can play on the 4th line (and not be a liability) and can fight! I'm hoping Ericsson goes at Perry as soon as the puck is dropped in game 4. Unfortunantly Pronger and Getzlaf are big so targeting their small guys, like they are with us, is only fair.

     

     

  3. scott says:

    Watson's horrible call absolutely impacted the outcome of game 3.  

     

    More concerning is the lack of consistency on non-calls for blatant interference.   Mr. Bettman will be quick to censure and fine a member of any organization who states the obvious blown call from the Wings-Ducks game 3, or derides the increase in uncalled interfence that harkens back to the clutch and grab days.

    The idea of open skating games, with a higher amount of scoring chances is something the Commissioner pays lip service to at the beginning of every playoff year.  But he reacts harshly to any public comments from within the NHL community when the reality doesn't match that ideal.

    Instead he'll likely want to further the discussion held in the Competition Committee last year to reduce the number of skaters to 4 on 4 after the 1st overtime.  Seems that long Stanley Cup playoff games can interfere with a TV networks scheduling. Tradition isn't really all that important. 

    Just another example of how the problems faced by the NHL are systemic.  The Commissioner won't openly discuss the horrific consequences lackluster officiating has on the integrity of the game. While at the same time, compounding that problem by tweaking was isn't broken because someone mentions to him that changing the playoff overtime format will make the NHL more marketable to TV.

     

  4. Wings4Ever says:

    Forget all the chit-chat about Brad Watson intending to blow the whistle, even though the replay clearly shows the puck going in before the whistle was blown. It is pure BS that an ignorant offical can cost a game and who knows how much more. This was the WORST Officiated (term used very litely) game I have seen in a long time. Too bad they couldn't be blowing their whistles as quickly at the end buzzer and stop the useless hitting ect. AFTER the game was over. Looks like the Wings need to step it up another notch and lay out a coule of more Ducks and make Duck Soup out of these clowns.

  5. hockeychic says:

    I just feel sick over what happened last night.  I thought their was goalie interference on the second goal and the call leading up to it was sketchy at best.  Then to have the "intent to whistle" thing added at the end.  It is just too much.

     

    It would have been nice if the Wings showed up for the first part of the game.  Really not sure what is going on there.

  6. John W. says:

    Exactly, to all previous comments and the original post by Matt. I know the rule is intent to blow the whistle (which was never blown), but when you watch that play, the ref didn't even start to move any part of his body to start to blow the play dead until AFTER he saw Hossa knock it in. The only thought process I can come up with is "Shit, I'm outta position, there's Hossa knocking the puck in, shit, I should have blown the whistle 4 seconds ago when I was in horrible position in the corner and couldn't see the puck, NO GOAL!" Either that, or they got a call during the 2nd intermission saying avoid OT at all costs, either way.

    What really gets me is, what if on that same play, the puck had snuck inside the post off of Hiller's skate on the initial stuff in front, but because where the ref was in the corner, he wouldn't have been able to see it, so could he say that wouldn't count either because he "lost sight"?

    Now my problem with the rule that it can't be reviewed. Why the hell can't the play be reviewed up until a whistle is blown? The players don't stop playing until the whistle is blown (or after) so please tell me why?

    As for the rest of the game, the officiating was just as bad. Nick got called for a slash on a stick that didn't break or even knock the Duck's player's stick out of his hands, wtf is that? The Stuart interference was just as bad, the guy had just touched the puck, how is that interference, especially when every time a Wing dumped a puck in, the Duck's held them up from going in after it with no call? Those are just the 2 I can remember in my current state of rage 10 hours later.

    As for the non-officiating side, can the Duck's get any luckier? Both goals were direct results of extremely lucky bounces. Selanne takes off on the initial blocked shot before he even saw who got the loose puck, if that goes to our guy, we have a 5 on 4 while Selanne sits at our blueline. The second goal, was not only knocked in by Nick, but I just saw the replay on SportsCenter, and a Duck ran right into Ozzie as the puck went over his head, of course with no call. If that play was the other way around, and Homer is anyway in sight, that's no goal. Ok so I guess I wasn't done with officiating.

    The Wing's didn't get off to the best start, but the Duck's sure didn't dominate the opening 30 either, there really weren't many chances either way early on.

    Detroit's quality of most of their shots is still very, very poor, too many wide or right into Hiller's chest.

    The end of this game I think either will cost us the series, or win us the series, and we'll know the answer at about 11:30 pm Thursday night. The Wing's should be utterly pissed, Hossa in particular and an angry Hossa is just scary to think about, and I expect the Wings to be up at least 3-0 after 1 period, and Hossa might have all 3. If the Ducks think the Wings came hard in the 3rd last night with the shots being 20-3, just wait until Game 4, at least I expect and hope so. If they get the split I fully expect, then I'm happy, because if you're gonna split, I'd rather win Game 4 than Game 3.

    If only we didn't have to wait until practically Friday for Game 4 to even start…

  7. John W. says:

    Another thing I just thought about with officiating, and this has less to do with the Hossa goal and more to do with every other horrid call they have made this series, is this:

    Q: What is the number 1 problem with officiating in the NHL?

    A: Consistency.

    So why in God's name don't the same officials work an entire series? At least this way the players would have some idea as to what is going to be called from game to game and we'd get the same bad officiating every game at least. If this happened, as a series goes on, games would get smoother and smoother with less calls each game, and we would all get better hockey.

    Does anyone know why we get a different crew each game during a series?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>