Wings 4, Sabres 1

Sorry for the delay in getting this out. I didn’t have time this morning before work, or last night after the game.

Scattered thoughts:

… It was good to see the Wings come through with the win against a team as desperate as the Sabres. Two games, two teams’ playoff hopes virtually crushed. That’s not a bad sequence, especially since it means some practice for the relatively similar scenario we can hope they’ll face in the playoffs: having to win over a team fighting to save its season.

… As John pointed out in the comments, they came out a bit flat in the first, and had to be bailed out by Chris Osgood. It’s too early to say for sure, but it looks like Osgood may be warming up now that he’s the named starter. He was really strong last night and would have had a shutout had either Dan Cleary or Chris Chelios cleared the puck on a flurry in the third.

I’m with John in liking our chances in the playoffs if Osgood keeps this up.

… Marian Hossa’s name is in the headlines today, and deservedly so. He had a great game, and looks to be comfortable in his reunion with Pavel Datsyuk. For a while, it seemed like he was floundering on other lines, which is disapointing, but at least we have a proven combination with those two.

… Anyway, Hossa’s production and role in the game cannot be diminished, but those numbers will overshadow what I thought was a real strong night by Henrik Zetterberg. He only got two one assist (one of which came on the late empty-netter Update: this was later credited to Datsyuk), but he was noticeably the best player on the ice during his shifts, and had he not been saddled with Dan “Dead Weight” Cleary and Johan “My Cold Nights Are Really Cold” Franzen, he might have outdone Hossa in the offense category.

Of course, I’m a Zetterberg partisan, so my opinion is no doubt skewed.

… I really like the Ericsson/Lidstrom pairing. Jonny gets to learn from the best, and any mistakes he makes are generally covered by Nick. I think Ericsson looks even more confident than usual in this arrangement.

… Franzen took a high stick to the face on a flurry at the center of play, and both referees somehow managed to miss it. Not sure what they were looking at since the puck was right there.

… The Sabres were really good at taking away the middle, which made the game frustrating to watch in stretches.

… I don’t know about you, but I thought the Wings looked scattered after the Sabres’ goal. It brought back memories of that fun first round series last year when it seemed like the Preds’ goals always came in pairs. I hope it’s not a trend that will return. The other team is going to score occassionally, and the Wings need to be able to rebound. Not every team is going to be as lightweight as the Sabres in followups.

… It was good to see Brad Stuart score. It reminded me of how infrequently we see that from him. Homer’s screen was, as usual, impeccable.

… Mikael Samuelsson is lucky he’s not facing an automatic suspension today. During a scrum in the second period, he grabbed a linesman around the shoulders from behind and given the League’s intolerance of touching officials, it’s surprising he’s not facing punishment.

… All in all, another strong effort. As with Osgood’s apparent turnaround, it’s probably too early to let our guard down, but it looks like they may have actually gotten the message, and are in fact getting it going before the playoffs. They’ll face a stiff test on Thursday against the Predators as well as this weekend against Chicago, but they seem to be on the right track.

… The Sharks play Colorado at home tonight. It’s probably a safe bet that they’ll be just a point from clinching the West after that one.

Filed under: 2008-2009, Game Reports

Tags:

Comments

  1. Ryan says:

    The Wings have had trouble in every first period on the second night of back-to-back games.  It's nothing to worry about.

     

    Actually, I thought Saturday's game against Minnesota was the best Zetterberg had all season.  Either way, it's good to see him (finally) getting back to the level he was at last year.  Franzen managed 5 shots, and even though most were from the outside, I'm not sure he had an unusually cold game.  I do agree about Cleary having been dead weight for the last couple, though.  It seems every time he gets a pass in the neutral zone, he skates a little, then nothing happens.  He's had a really weird year.

     

    Datsyuk's pass on Hossa's second goal was a thing of beauty.  So was Hossa's pass on Datsyuk's goal the night before.  I think they've had better chemistry the last two games than pretty much any other time they played together.  If they keep that up (and Zetterberg keeps generating offence at even strength), it may just be enough to make me happy with these lines.  Also–finally Babcock puts Zetterberg back on the second unit where he can do more good.  I'm still disappointed Ericsson hasn't seen some more power play time, though, especially in place of Stuart.

     

    And don't get too excited for a turnaround.  Every single Wing loss this year has been called a terrible effort by bloggers and commenters, either by the Wings or by their goalie.  Whether they're right or wrong, that's just how the fans are this year, and I don't see why that would change in the playoffs.  So unless they go 16-0, expect complaints about bad efforts or bad goaltending.

  2. Carole says:

    I continue to be perplexed why Z should be on the second line? Didn't we win the Cup last year with him centering Holmstrom and Datsyuk? Did we all forget Hank was the Conn Smythe trophy winner? In my opinion "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". If Hossa is such a strong player why doesn't he play on the second line wtih Franzen and Cleary? I continue to be irked that Hank gets bounced around, he earned his spot and is our future captain. Babs continually puts him up against the opponents top line to defend them, yet all the accolades continue to go to Datsyuk as the best defensive player? I'm sorry, the work Hank does on the ice: keepin the opposition at bay; continual strong performance on PK; selfless player and key leader on the ice; huge winner on the faceoff, etc. Most of these efforts cannot be measured in statistics thus people whine and think Hank is having an "off year". Well, with all due respect, while hes doing battle against the oppositions top line night after nigh, that is not an optimal situation to lead the team in scoring points, but certainly makes it easier for the likes of Hossa and Datsyuk to roll up points reaping the benefit of playing against the oppositions 2nd or 3rd line. Doesn't anyone else see this? I'm sorry, our ascending captain is a team player beyond words and IMHO would have hit 5O goals and 90 points if he played the season start to fiinish with Datsyuk. Enough said.

  3. Matt Saler says:

    The Wings have had trouble in every first period on the second night of back-to-back games.  It’s nothing to worry about.

    Oh, I know. They've also struggled in a lot of first periods after 1+ day breaks. The point is Osgood was there to hold on until his teammates caught up.

    Franzen managed 5 shots, and even though most were from the outside, I’m not sure he had an unusually cold game.

    I dunno – I just didn't find him all that noticeable, five shots or not. And it wasn't just that he wasn't scoring. There are nights where he's putting the puck in the net, nights where he's dominant in each end, nights where he's just strong defensively, and nights where he doesn't do much. I lean toward last night being a "not much" night.

    It seems every time he gets a pass in the neutral zone, he skates a little, then nothing happens.

    Or he forces an off-sides with either a bad pass or a dumb move at the line.

    I’m still disappointed Ericsson hasn’t seen some more power play time, though, especially in place of Stuart.

    Yeah, that is disappointing. You'd think that Babcock would like the idea of putting a cannon like that on the point. He's a rookie, which is a strike against him, but there's simply no way he could be worse than Samuelsson back there when it comes to gaffes at the blueline.

    And don’t get too excited for a turnaround.

    I'm relieved, that's all.

    I can handle "honest" losses. I mean, losses in which they put forth a good effort. That's what's been missing in so many games this season: the good effort. For me, anyway, it's less frustration with losing itself, and more with the manner of losing.

    Carole,

    That's a good question, but the answer is what you see when Hossa and Datsyuk are paired. There's no denying Zetterberg and Datsyuk's chemistry, but at the moment, it's Hossa and Datsyuk that are clicking. As soon as that stops, the Eurotwins will be back together until they stop clicking. And so on. Whatever's working.

  4. Carole says:

    Matt I agree with you about Franzen. I clearly think Cleary (no pun intended) has underperformed this year and has attributed to the drop in Z's point production. Last year he played the same role as Holmstrom, much less so this year and has been a bit of an anchor. I think he gives his "all" but just doesn't have the skill set.

    Honestly though, can anyone really challenge the proven Stanley

    Cup winning pair of the Dats and Z?? I have been following this all year. Almost the entire first half of the year Hossa was paired with Dats (that did admittedly irk me, I felt like Hosaa waltzed in and our Conn Smythe wiiner got "kicked to the curb"). After Z's contract he got paried up wtih Dats and both of their production increased. They have a chemistry that is clearly outside the box or and diagrams drawn up on Babcock's white board…why mess with that? They have been paired together intermittently the last month or so, I don't think they've had a chance all season to regain that Euro Twin chemistry. Once we are in playoffs, I expect (and hope) to see the Euro twins back in action. Z seems to go into a zone in playoffs, we will need that. Frankly, I think Hossa is such a strong player and drives to the net that he would be better suited on a second line with Franzen.. With our tenuous goal-tending, time will tell. I'm afraid we might be seeing the Ducks in the first round.

  5. Matt Saler says:

    Carole,

    I think the main motivation for splitting up the Eurotwins, in addition to the Hossa/Datsyuk chemistry, is the need to spread the puck around. Zetterberg provides a proven play-making center to the second line, which is something neither Hudler (lacking as a center) and Filppula (lacking as a playmaker) are.

  6. Jason says:

    I toss my two cents of agreement into Matt's piggy bank, and maybe expand on it to say that Mr. Babs is very much like Scotty Bowman in that he's not afraid to jumble his lines up on a whim, sometimes just to see if something works, and many times I think just to make sure his players don't get too comfortable. He likes to push the guys to be able to play with anyone at anytime, in the same way he expects players to be able to play in any situation, because as we know, anything can happen–players get hurt, and you can't rely on merely the chemistry of two or three players to carry you through, especially when one or two of those players goes down, even for a period, or just shift–because in a playoff game, that can be the difference. In the same vein, Babs could toss Dats, Hossa and Hank out there 25-26 minutes a night like Malkin, Crosby and Ovechkin have to, and they'd likely rack up a lot more points, and one of them would probably wind up with richard, art ross and hart trophies, because we know how that sham system works, but they'd be a top heavy team and those are always the first to fall in the playoffs. So sacrificing a bit off a your top players' point-production and forfeiting a few regular season wins is worth it for the long haul, I think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>