Update (10:50 AM): George Malik has some excellent post-game comments here and his media round-up is here. - Matt
… First off, this one lived up to the hype from an excitement and passion standpoint. In the final minutes, I found myself having the same stomach flips I usually have in the playoffs. It was a thrilling finish, to be sure.
However, I also found myself as pissed off throughout the game as I generally do in playoff games that go badly. Throughout the game, I was reminded many times just how much I dislike the Sharks. I had forgotten.
… Credit goes to the Sharks for the win. They came out of the gates flying and only had to deal with the Wings playing at their best for relatively short bursts throughout the game. San Jose came in with a chip on their shoulders and a mindset that they had something to prove. It colored everything in this game, from their in-play actions to those after the whistle.
Some of their post-whistle antics could be interpreted as the acting out of an inferiority complex, but the success they had tonight showed a team full of confidence. This team is nearly to the point now where the Wings are out of their heads and where future meetings can be decided on pure skill and will to win.
… As for the Wings, their performance was a disappointment. They looked good in spots, but overall looked fairly average. The two breakaways that led to goals in the third were pathetic displays, as was their showing on the first goal of the game. They played well enough to keep it close, but never hit that high gear.
… I was disappointed with the Sharks’ tendency to fall down seemingly whenever they were touched by a Red Wing stick or glove. They are a far better team than that, and shouldn’t need to resort to diving tactics as part of their overall strategy to win.
… Pavel Datsyuk had yet another strong game. His play to Johan Franzen for the Wings’ third was spectacular and he remained a threat all night.
… I thought Henrik Zetterberg showed good jump tonight. He made a nice individual effort assisting on the Wings’ 5th goal and notched a nice one of his own earlier in the game.
… Osgood was hung out to dry on nearly all six goals, but could have stopped one or two more.
… The Franzen injury was definitely a big one. The Wings really could have used his tendency for clutch goal-scoring in the third period.
… It looks like Patrick Marleau was off-sides on his game-winner. So what? He never should have been able to break in behind the Wings defense, regardless of whether or not it was onsides. That the linesman may have missed it is no excuse for bad defense. Edit: More on this in the comments. - Matt
… My wife said after the game that if this was a preview of the Conference Finals, home ice advantage is going to be huge. I do not relish the thought of such a series.
… I will say, though, that it’s worth bearing in mind that this is still January and this game was only worth two points, not a series. It sucks, but I’d rather it happen now than in June.




Sharks diving tactics?????
Yeah, that is where the game was won. 3 power plays for each team.
It was a hell of a game, with the Sharks 2nd line skating all over the place, accounting for 5 of the 6 Sharks goals.
The energy inside the Tank last night was awesome. I can attest, as I was contributing to the energy firsthand.
The Wings better hope they don’t have to play a game 7 in that building, with all of the diving tactics they will have to deal with and all.
Dimitry,
I never said that’s why the Sharks won. In fact, I gave them their due for playing a great game, and ripped the Wings for putting on an overall poor performance.
If you return to my statement, note the words “part of.” While variety of other tactics contributed more to their winning strategy, that doesn’t mean falling down when hooked slightly or touched with a glove wasn’t part of the package.
I don’t know that anyone with an objective view of the game can deny that the Sharks went down easily all night. I happen to think those tactics should be beneath a team with San Jose’s talent level.
Fortunately, the officials last night had the intellectual self-respect to not wholly buy the Sharks’ act. I’d hate to have seen an otherwise excellent San Jose effort tarnished by too many phantom calls on the second-least penalized team in the League, Detroit.
I’d like you to know that when I typed the post, I meant the statement to say
It’s one of those cases where you write something out in your head and it doesn’t all make the transition to the screen.
All good. I was in the upper level, so couldn’t really tell. But I don’t think the Wings did as much to win that game last night.
I will say that after seeing the replay, Patty was offsides, clearly.
Can’t wait until spring.
Read this.-
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news;_ylt=ApRqsV70Xp4jnZet_08c7hZ7vLYF?slug=rm-detsan011809&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
Yeah, I didn’t see them up close, so I can’t say. I was in the upper level. We did get the impression we were getting “jobbed” a little. But that must have been due to 50/50 calls.
But, what an excellent, ultra-entertaining game on both sides. I can’t wait until the Playoffs.
I wondered if Marleau was offsides… I found this screen capture:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7553/clearlyonsidesxr0.jpg
Has this been photoshopped?
No disagreement here, dimitry.
jb,
I actually don’t think it was photoshopped. What probably have happened was Marleau was offsides to start but touched up before picking up the puck. In most situations, his proximity to the puck prior to touching up on the blueline would have meant a whistle, but I believe the linesman is given some discretion on that. Unfortunately, this time he opted to let it go.
But, that doesn’t explain why Marleau was able to get in behind the Wings’ defense in the first place. So, regardless of the call, the Sharks outdid the Wings on that one.