<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacLeod on Brunnstrom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/05/01/macleod-on-brunnstrom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/05/01/macleod-on-brunnstrom/</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baroque</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/05/01/macleod-on-brunnstrom/#comment-57261</link>
		<dc:creator>Baroque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/?p=2211#comment-57261</guid>
		<description>My initial guess was that the "top-six forward demand" was more agent posturing on behalf of his client than anything from the young man himself.  From his comments, it looks like that might be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial guess was that the &#8220;top-six forward demand&#8221; was more agent posturing on behalf of his client than anything from the young man himself.  From his comments, it looks like that might be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.696 seconds -->
