<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wings 4, Stars 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Round 3 Series Preview: 1 Detroit vs. 5 Dallas at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-57292</link>
		<dc:creator>Round 3 Series Preview: 1 Detroit vs. 5 Dallas at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-57292</guid>
		<description>[...] won the 2007-2008 season series 3-1, with wins January 2nd (4-1), January 5th (3-0), and March 13th (5-3). During the Wings&#8217; 1-8-2 February skid the Stars [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won the 2007-2008 season series 3-1, with wins January 2nd (4-1), January 5th (3-0), and March 13th (5-3). During the Wings&#8217; 1-8-2 February skid the Stars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Dallas (36-21-5, 77 Pts) 3:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-56890</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Dallas (36-21-5, 77 Pts) 3:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-56890</guid>
		<description>[...] on NBC in the Game of the Week. The Wings won both of the previous meetings, beginning with a 4-1 decision on January 2nd and continuing with a 3-0 shutout on January 5th.  The fourth and final [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on NBC in the Game of the Week. The Wings won both of the previous meetings, beginning with a 4-1 decision on January 2nd and continuing with a 3-0 shutout on January 5th.  The fourth and final [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: vs. Phoenix (27-21-2, 56 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-55853</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: vs. Phoenix (27-21-2, 56 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-55853</guid>
		<description>[...] of four wins sandwiching a three-game skid. They began the month with a pair of wins over Dallas (4-1, 3-0) and a win each over Chicago (3-1) and Colorado (1-0).  They then lost in a shootout to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of four wins sandwiching a three-game skid. They began the month with a pair of wins over Dallas (4-1, 3-0) and a win each over Chicago (3-1) and Colorado (1-0).  They then lost in a shootout to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: vs. Atlanta (22-22-2, 46 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-52311</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: vs. Atlanta (22-22-2, 46 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-52311</guid>
		<description>[...] This slide began with the team&#8217;s too-tightly-contested 1-0 win over Colorado on the 8th. Prior to that, they had put on strong performances in games against Chicago (3-1) and Dallas (3-0, 4-1). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This slide began with the team&#8217;s too-tightly-contested 1-0 win over Colorado on the 8th. Prior to that, they had put on strong performances in games against Chicago (3-1) and Dallas (3-0, 4-1). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Dallas (23-15-4, 50 Pts) 2:00 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49754</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Dallas (23-15-4, 50 Pts) 2:00 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49754</guid>
		<description>[...] time this season this afternoon. They last met on Wednesday in Detroit in a game the Wings won, 4-1. The remaining two games are scheduled for February 17th and March [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time this season this afternoon. They last met on Wednesday in Detroit in a game the Wings won, 4-1. The remaining two games are scheduled for February 17th and March [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49404</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49404</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Whichever team has to play catch-up hockey is going to come out on the losing end.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Good point, Todd. Had the bounces gone even a little differently, the Wings would have been the ones playing catch up. &lt;blockquote&gt;The hit on Lidstrom was almost accidental.&lt;/blockquote&gt; I suppose so. It certainly looked worse than it was, but it was good to see Drake stand up for Nick. &lt;blockquote&gt;You also have to give Dallas credit for not resorting to cheap shots once the game was obviously unwinnable (ala Flames, Flyers, and Blues). Setting the tone for Saturday. I still admire Tippit for sticking to his ‘absolutely no diving on this team’ policy. Saturday should be a great game.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Another good point. The Stars are a class organization, in contrast with those others you mention. 

What's interesting is that the Wings had a sort of secondary rivalry with the Stars (relative to the one with the Avs). Both games against the "former" rivals were very clean. It's definitely a new world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whichever team has to play catch-up hockey is going to come out on the losing end.</p></blockquote>
<p> Good point, Todd. Had the bounces gone even a little differently, the Wings would have been the ones playing catch up.<br />
<blockquote>The hit on Lidstrom was almost accidental.</p></blockquote>
<p> I suppose so. It certainly looked worse than it was, but it was good to see Drake stand up for Nick.<br />
<blockquote>You also have to give Dallas credit for not resorting to cheap shots once the game was obviously unwinnable (ala Flames, Flyers, and Blues). Setting the tone for Saturday. I still admire Tippit for sticking to his ‘absolutely no diving on this team’ policy. Saturday should be a great game.</p></blockquote>
<p> Another good point. The Stars are a class organization, in contrast with those others you mention. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that the Wings had a sort of secondary rivalry with the Stars (relative to the one with the Avs). Both games against the &#8220;former&#8221; rivals were very clean. It&#8217;s definitely a new world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HockeyTownTodd</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49354</link>
		<dc:creator>HockeyTownTodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2008/01/03/wings-4-stars-1-2/#comment-49354</guid>
		<description>I  saw this game start out as:
Whichever team has to play catch-up hockey is going to come out on the losing end.  The hit on Lidstrom was almost accidental.  You also have to give Dallas credit for not resorting to cheap shots once the game was obviously unwinnable (ala Flames, Flyers, and Blues). Setting the tone for Saturday.  I still admire Tippit for sticking to his 'absolutely no diving on this team' policy.  Saturday should be a great game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  saw this game start out as:<br />
Whichever team has to play catch-up hockey is going to come out on the losing end.  The hit on Lidstrom was almost accidental.  You also have to give Dallas credit for not resorting to cheap shots once the game was obviously unwinnable (ala Flames, Flyers, and Blues). Setting the tone for Saturday.  I still admire Tippit for sticking to his &#8216;absolutely no diving on this team&#8217; policy.  Saturday should be a great game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.297 seconds -->
