<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 3: Wings 5, Ducks 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/#comment-18405</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/#comment-18405</guid>
		<description>Wow... Detroit Killed the Dumbass Ducks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; Detroit Killed the Dumbass Ducks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/#comment-18398</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/05/16/game-3-wings-5-ducks-0/#comment-18398</guid>
		<description>I don't think enough credit has been given to Babcock, here. I know you mention the line changes, and I'm certainly not criticizing you, cause it's true across the board. 

There was certainly not a pressing need to change up the lines - the Wings were skating dead even with the Ducks, at least on the scoreboard, through the first two games. But what a move Babs makes  - splitting his top line to spread the talent around, yet keeping the power play lines the same. The latter move/non-move only produced one goal, but it was 5 on 5 play that needed tweaking, not the special teams.

Also, I cannot say enough about the ridiculousness of Marchant being being the 3rd star, and/or Hasek being shut out of the top stars. Hopefully that'll just fire him up further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think enough credit has been given to Babcock, here. I know you mention the line changes, and I&#8217;m certainly not criticizing you, cause it&#8217;s true across the board. </p>
<p>There was certainly not a pressing need to change up the lines - the Wings were skating dead even with the Ducks, at least on the scoreboard, through the first two games. But what a move Babs makes  - splitting his top line to spread the talent around, yet keeping the power play lines the same. The latter move/non-move only produced one goal, but it was 5 on 5 play that needed tweaking, not the special teams.</p>
<p>Also, I cannot say enough about the ridiculousness of Marchant being being the 3rd star, and/or Hasek being shut out of the top stars. Hopefully that&#8217;ll just fire him up further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.330 seconds -->
