Game 3: Wings 2, Flames 3

The Wings lost for the first time this postseason last night, dropping a 3-2 decision to the Calgary Flames in Game 3 of their Western Conference Quarterfinal series. Overall, they were outplayed by the Flames in both ends of the ice and didn’t look much like the team that stormed to a 2-0 lead in the series at home. Calgary finally showed up and had something resembling the game they’ve been wanting to play, though I’m not sure they have demonstrated all they can do yet.

I don’t have time for a full recap today, so I’ll just hit a few points.

… First of all, that ten minute slam that the Flames and their fans were talking about did not materialize. Play was mostly even in the first ten and the crowd didn’t seem as loud after the first few minutes. That was encouraging as a Wings, though only because I’d expected to see them have to weather a storm. On looking back, a better first period would have been a good thing, but at the time I was relieved.

… On that note, the loudness, or the lack thereof, of the arena was a letdown. Last year, Rexall Place was rocking for the majority of the game. Last night, the Saddledome was only loud for short stretches, it seemed to me. Not long fter the Flames’ second goal, a fire alarm started going off inside the arena and continued for a while loudly enough to be annoying through the TV. I don’t know why it happened, but it wouldn’t surprise me if some yahoo pulled it to celebrate the goal.

… The Wings power play was still bad last night and it’s really becoming an issue. They had a four-minute man-advantage after Wayne Primeau chopped Dan Cleary in the nose. They did nothing with it. That said, they didn’t exactly have a plethora of chances and that they went 0-4 (0-3, really) isn’t all that surprising.

… Which leads me to my next point: the officiating. I hate being one of those whiny fans that complains about officiating, but I really think it had too much of a role in last night’s game. You can disagree, but that’s my honest opinion. It’s a matter of missed calls and bad calls combined that really hampered the Wings’ chances last night. I believe the Flames probably would have won anyway, given how Detroit played, but they got help from the officials they did not need, and unfairly limited the Wings’ chances at eking out a win in spite of being generally outplayed.

Missed call case-in-point #1:

At 9:15 or so of the third period, the Wings were moving the puck around the Flames zone and it ended up coming around the back of the net and up the right wing on a shootaround. Henrik Zetterberg went after it, but Wayne Primeau (I believe) stepped over and held him back with his arm. Interference, holding, something. No call. The puck goes the other way and Jarome Iginla found a way to beat both Nick Lidstrom and Dominik Hasek to give the Flames a 3-2 lead at 9:21.

Watch the replay, you’ll see what I’m talking about at the start. Flames fans, you can be as excited as you want about Jarome’s finally breaking into this series, but the fact is that rush never should have happened. It’s disgusting. That blown call was just one of many missed interference calls on the Flames last night.

Missed call case-in-point #2:

At 11:07 of the third, Kyle Calder was called for goaltender interference on Miika Kiprusoff. He skated through the crease and lightly bumped Kiprusoff’s head, which was sticking out, as he tried to squeeze in between the goalie and the defenseman. Goaltender interference? Okay, I can see that, I suppose.

What I can’t see is why the official did not have enough self-respect to call Kiprusoff for diving. The guy threw his head back like he’d taken a shot from Ivan Drago and dropped like someone had taken an ax to his legs. Why don’t officials take that kind of crap more personally? You’d think officials would see diving as an insult to their professional integrity. It wasn’t even subtle. The teams should have been skating four a side.

Bad call case-in-point #1:

At 3:16 of the third, Mathieu Schneider was called for interference because he skated backwards into a Flame while his attention was on the puck. It was completely accidental and was a pretty weak call. The Flames scored on the subsequent power play and tied the game at two.

Bad call case-in-point #2:

The Wings were getting some pressure in the Flames’ zone and it culminated with a pass back to the point to Danny Markov. The puck was bouncing like crazy (as it was all night) and Danny fanned on it. It skidded to a stop behind him and was sitting there ripe for the picking of any Flames player that could get to it. Well, Jeff Friesen wanted it and decided the best path was through Markov, who had just finished the follow-through on his shot and was planted in the same spot he’d been in for 5-6 seconds. Friesen, of course, bounced off Markov and didn’t make it to the puck, so, of course, the official whistled Markov for interference instead of sending Friesen to the box for being an idiot.

I’ll dumb it down for you, Jeff: people are hard, you can’t go through them. If you want something on the other side of someone, you have to step around them. Anyway, the Flames didn’t score on that one, but it was still pretty galling.

I’m not upset that the Wings didn’t get more power plays, because they’ve been pretty awful in that capacity all series. It’s that the Flames were getting away with so much, while the Wings were slapped with phantom calls, that pisses me off.

… Todd Bertuzzi: I thought he looked okay, but he definitely didn’t provide the spark the Wings were hoping for. He had some hits after he started throwing his body around later in the game, but overall, he was pretty underwhelming. When you look at how Jiri Hudler brings it on every shift, you have to wonder if sitting him in favor of Todd or Samuelsson wasn’t a mistake. Bertuzzi had little or no chemistry with Franzen and Filppula, which meant those two didn’t have the games they should have.

… Hasek looked steady, for the most part, but he allowed a goal on Iginla that he never should have. I don’t care if Lidstrom let him down. Lilja had covered the pass and it was up to Dom to handle Iginla, but he just whiffed on it. Nice shot by Jarome, but Hasek should have had it.

… Not sure what Babcock was thinking at the end of the game. He put the #1 line out there, when they’d been fairely ineffective all night, when #3 probably would have been a better choice, given how they’d been creating chances throughout the game. The decision to put Lang out there on the final faceoff was especially bad. Robert has been awful in the faceoff circle this series and his presence out there in the final seconds basically meant the Wings acceded the game.

… Aside from the great third line, which was dangerous all night, a bright spot in the game was, surprisingly enough, Andreas Lilja. He’s been great in this series thus far and continued to play well last night. He had a couple bad plays, but they were overshadowed by a lot more stellar ones. I want to know where he was in the regular season, because now he’s becoming a force.

… As for the third line, Dan Cleary, Kirk Maltby, and Kris Draper were all great. Cleary assisted on Draper’s two goals and knocked Dion Phaneuf on his can just before dishing the puck off to Drapes on the goal that put the Wings up 2-1 at the start of the third. He took a high stick to the mouth, got some stitches, came back, and got involved right away. He was causing the Flames defenders fits all night and was on the receiving end of some nasty post-play scrums. A great night for Cleary and his linemates, for sure. Hopefully the Wings will feed off that on Thursday.

… Overall, I don’t think the Wings played that badly. They definitely didn’t play as well as they did in Games 1 and 2, though, and that, coupled with the Flames decision to actually show up, probably would have meant a loss regardless of the officiating, like I said above. They weren’t as physical or as energetic, though they did have their moments, and it really hurt them. They flat out have to be better and more consistent in Game 4. Frankly, I’m confident they will be. I suspect we’ll see the ornery Wings of Game 1 again.

Other reactions:
Gorilla Crouch
Behind the Jersey
Quo Vadimus
The Real Deal

Filed under: 2006-2007, Playoffs

Tags:

Comments

  1. Megan says:

    Matt, I disagree. I really don't think you can say that the Wings would have lost anyway. I thought the game was pretty even, despite the officiating. The Wings weren't as good as they were at home, but that doesn't mean they played badly. This was a west coast game, which we generally are not good at; but last night, we actually played well. We were still physical, our defense was still good, and we kept up with the Flames, who are very dangerous at home. All in all, it wasn't a bad night. On top of that, we weren't getting as many chances partially because the Flames were all over us, and getting away with it. Plus the phantom calls that must have frustrated the whole team. I really don't think the Wings were outplayed, but I also don't think the Flames played badly. The point is, without the bad officiating, I think the Wings would have had a good chance. Look how close they were with that factor.

  2. Matt Saler says:

    Yes, the Wings kept it close, but I'm still not convinced they would have won. As it was, they showed little of the drive that earned them wins in Games 1 and 2, a drive they had displayed despite the fact the Flames were not called for many things in those games as well. Playing "keep up" with a Flames team playing B-grade hockey doesn't mean you're playing especially well. Most of their play was reactive rather than proactive, with Calgary holding most of the initiative. The Flames had that extra motivation and out-skated the Wings in far too many cases.

    Yes, those calls were bad, but the Wings had the chance to kill off those penalties and they didn't. We can only put so much blame on the officials before putting the rest on the players. I've seen them battle through bad officiating before, so they had a chance at winning the game, in spite of the infractions the Flames were committing but not getting called for. My disappointment in their performance stems from their not having risen to the occasion.

    I'm upset with the officiating, don't get me wrong. It was atrocious and, like I wrote above, played far too large a role in the game. However, final responsibility lies with the Wings and maybe I should have said that more strongly in my post.

    Perhaps my opinion that the Flames would have won anyway is based largely on my pre-series prediction that they'd win Game 3. I guess that's also why I'm so confident the Wings will rebound with a win in Game 4 and then wrap things up in Game 5.

  3. Tim says:

    I agree with you Matt in the fact that the officiated played a big role, but wasn't the deciding factor. However, I really think that the PP and PK are to blame for the loss. Also, I think that Calgary home and Calgary away are 2 different teams… 30-9-2 at home and 13-20-8 away. I don't think Detroit was ready for the second calgary team to show up. I know that this is my second comment now that points at the Power Play, but Detroit has really struggled and I fear that teams are more willing to take a penalty to prevent a 5 on 5 goal.

  4. Alex says:

    I can see where you were coming form with Lilja now that I look bacvk on the game Matt. Other than a few plays, he was pretty solid.

    I also have to admit that I didn't think the wings would win game 3. I have always however, expected them to win game 4. I'm expecting the same thing you are from the Wings, which more of the tenacity and nastiness that won them games 1 and 2. I still would love for Lang to be benched for Hudler, but I think Samuelsson is going to sit. I don't Babcock can sit Jiri another game.

    I guess I was kind of overreacting last night with saying tomorrow is gloom-nad-doom lol. It's just, that thrid period really had me flashing back to 2006, 2004 and 2003. Hopefully this is the last the Wings see of McCreary this series.

  5. Kyle says:

    Don't you think its an effort in futility to go over 'missed calls' after the only losing effort from the Wings so far. There were plenty of missed calls both ways, despite the efforts of Red Wings bloggers to paint the opposite picture.

    It would be very easy for me to keep a pen and a pad with me throughout the game and identify 20-30 missed calls for Detroit, and the same for Calgary.

  6. Sarah Baker says:

    I don't think that the officiating was the only deciding factor in the game. However, I feel like it took the game out of the hands of the players. It was a really close game and I think the teams were playing pretty evenly matched. Who knows what would have happened if the Wings hadn't been saddled with so many bogus penalties or if Calgary had actually been called for some of the interference they were doing. I feel like I got jipped out of the chance to see these teams really battle it out. I can't believe I'm saying this, but we got better officiating from Mick Mcgeough.

    Besides the officiating, we certainly were not perfect in all areas. Lang still isn't doing anything (unless you count losing faceoffs). Babs made some questionable decisions, the worst of which was putting Lang out for that final faceoff. He has had the worst faceoff percentage of the entire team for the last two games at least. I'm assuming (because I don't think Babcock is a complete idiot) that this was some failed attempt at motivating Lang. I personally don't know why he didn't just go with his original plan of putting Bert on his line. Sounds like he's planning on doing that tomorrow though so I guess we'll see if it works.

    Zetterberg seemed like he was a step behind all night. He and Pavel were definitely not in sync as they usually are. Here's hoping it was just a case of jet-lag and he'll be back on track tomorrow.

    I think Dom had a good performance overall, but never should have given up that Iginla goal. I don't know what was going on there.

    At any rate, it greatly comforts me that this was a one goal loss and not a blowout. I am confident the Wings will come out strong tomorrow and pull out a win at the Saddledome.

  7. Shv says:

    I was at the game last night, and trust me, the Dome was CRAZY loud. probably didn't translate well on TV, but the rafters were shaking.

  8. Matt Saler says:

    Kyle,

    If it's an effort in futility, why blog at all? My job as a blogger is to look at these things. I assume it's the same for you.

    During the game, I commented that the officiating was bad overall and I admitted they were probably missing things on the Wings too. I have no doubt that it went both ways. However, you're extra sensitive to what infractions the Wings commit and I'm extra sensitive to what the Flames do. We both miss what our team does. The truth is somewhere in between.

    That's not the point, though. The point is the Wings got jobbed on two penalties and one major interference call was missed. Even if you think their penalties were deserved, I would hope you'd be honest enough to admit that Zetterberg was interfered with. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Flames were slapped with any particularly bad phantom calls last night, nor did a blown call by the officials result directly in a Detroit goal. Even if only the interference by Primeau on Zetterberg was called, I wouldn't be talking so much about the officiating.

    Shv,

    Perhaps the arena mics just didn't pick everything up. Still, it wasn't as loud as Rexall, which you could hear nearly drowning out the TV announcers last spring.

  9. Kyle says:

    Matt,
    All I'm saying is that putting the outcome of 60 minutes of hockey on 2-3 calls is a copout, and that the gamestory you projected could be written for all 82 games on all 30 teams.

    and also, I was the game last night, at Rexall last year and the Dome in 04, and it was easily as loud last night as those events, but clearly the tv michs didn't pick it up (although they did apparently pick up the fire alarm.)

  10. Matt Saler says:

    Kyle,

    I'm not saying the Wings didn't have a chance to win in spite of those calls. They did. I wrote above that the final responsibility for their loss was in their hands. Still, I felt like the officiating played far too big a role in the game. I'm with Sarah, I feel like I was denied the ability to watch two great teams because of all the stuff that was missed and because of the calls that were bad.

    Not with every game is the officiating so instrumental. If the Flames had not scored on those power plays or that rush following the missed interference call, you could compare the game to any generic one. But they did score and that makes those calls significant. Again, the Wings could have overcome that stuff, but the officials shouldn't put them in that kind of position, whether they're playing in Calgary or not.

    Yes, they definitely picked up the alarm. And they picked up the crowd being loud at times. It just didn't seem to be so loud the whole game.

  11. firebettman says:

    I can't believe Babs put Lang out for that final faceoff.

    I say keep Bertuzzi out and go with what you had the first two games… that teamed showed up and won the games without a problem.

  1. [...] at On the Wings posted a solid game recap and talks about some of the missed calls or even wrong calls that the [...]

  2. [...] having won the first two games (4-1, 3-1). The Flames took the first game in Calgary on Tuesday, 3-2. Game 5 is on Saturday at 3:00 ET in Detroit and Game 6, if necessary, is Sunday in Calgary, though [...]

  3. [...] did a decent job in game 1 vs Calgary. Meanwhile, somehow Bill Mcreary (you may remember him from game 3) managed to slip through. How did that happen? Maybe the NHL just decided not to take the [...]

  4. [...] (7:20 PM): I just remembered that a Franzen-Filppula-Bertuzzi line was tried in Game 3 of the first round. It was Todd Bertuzzi’s return from a concussion, so it was classified as [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>