<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wings 5, Preds 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Game 1: vs. San Jose, 7:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-16994&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-16994</link>
		<dc:creator>Game 1: vs. San Jose, 7:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-16994</guid>
		<description>[...] in their six games against Nashville, with wins January 17th (5-3), March 6th (4-3 SO), March 13th (5-2), March 14th (4-2), and March 29th (2-1). The loss came on February 24th (4-3 OT). Granted, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in their six games against Nashville, with wins January 17th (5-3), March 6th (4-3 SO), March 13th (5-2), March 14th (4-2), and March 29th (2-1). The loss came on February 24th (4-3 OT). Granted, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Nashville (49-21-7, 105 Pts) 8:00 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-14222&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-14222</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Nashville (49-21-7, 105 Pts) 8:00 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-14222</guid>
		<description>[...] the series 5-2, with wins November 10th (3-0), January 17th (5-3), March 6th (4-3 SO), March 13th (5-2), and March 14th (4-2). The Preds won the November 25th (6-2) and February 24th (4-3 OT) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the series 5-2, with wins November 10th (3-0), January 17th (5-3), March 6th (4-3 SO), March 13th (5-2), and March 14th (4-2). The Preds won the November 25th (6-2) and February 24th (4-3 OT) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Vancouver (42-23-6, 90 Pts) 10:00 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12664&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12664</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Vancouver (42-23-6, 90 Pts) 10:00 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12664</guid>
		<description>[...] 6th in Detroit, a 4-3 SO decision. The next two came on back-to-back nights, with the Wings winning 5-2 first in Nashville and then 4-2 in Detroit. That latest win put the Wings a point ahead of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6th in Detroit, a 4-3 SO decision. The next two came on back-to-back nights, with the Wings winning 5-2 first in Nashville and then 4-2 in Detroit. That latest win put the Wings a point ahead of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings 4, Preds 2 at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12403&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12403</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings 4, Preds 2 at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12403</guid>
		<description>[...] night after winning a wild meeting in Nashville for the first half of the Big Showdown, the Wings won a much tamer game at home, 4-2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night after winning a wild meeting in Nashville for the first half of the Big Showdown, the Wings won a much tamer game at home, 4-2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12355&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12355</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12355</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; a false statement, but I admit a different wording would have been more clear. 

Don&#039;t come here, read one post and assume I&#039;m all about taking pot shots. This is a rivalry and things are going to be a bit more emotional. So don&#039;t be surprised that I laid the rhetoric on thick. But just because it&#039;s thick doesn&#039;t mean there isn&#039;t some truth to it. 

If you want strict neutrality, read the AP report on the game. I try to be honest while at the same time retaining my Red Wings fanship and if you don&#039;t like it, tough. This isn&#039;t a Predators fanblog and I&#039;m not about to cater to anyone, except maybe fellow Wings fans. Like I told your compatriot above, I&#039;m a long-time fan and not some bandwagoner spouting off. I have my own views on the game and I don&#039;t apologize for it. I may say some over-the-top things, but it&#039;s always balanced out by other statements, and used for effect only. 

&lt;em&gt;We’ll see come playoff time who’s left standing.&lt;/em&gt;

Yes, yes we will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s <strong>not</strong> a false statement, but I admit a different wording would have been more clear. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t come here, read one post and assume I&#8217;m all about taking pot shots. This is a rivalry and things are going to be a bit more emotional. So don&#8217;t be surprised that I laid the rhetoric on thick. But just because it&#8217;s thick doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t some truth to it. </p>
<p>If you want strict neutrality, read the AP report on the game. I try to be honest while at the same time retaining my Red Wings fanship and if you don&#8217;t like it, tough. This isn&#8217;t a Predators fanblog and I&#8217;m not about to cater to anyone, except maybe fellow Wings fans. Like I told your compatriot above, I&#8217;m a long-time fan and not some bandwagoner spouting off. I have my own views on the game and I don&#8217;t apologize for it. I may say some over-the-top things, but it&#8217;s always balanced out by other statements, and used for effect only. </p>
<p><em>We’ll see come playoff time who’s left standing.</em></p>
<p>Yes, yes we will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonesey</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12353&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12353</guid>
		<description>but it&#039;s also a false statment. you should have said no one has scored a series clinching goal FOR the Predators.

I know, it seems like you are all about taking pot shots, but it&#039;s ok.  We&#039;ll see come playoff time who&#039;s left standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but it&#8217;s also a false statment. you should have said no one has scored a series clinching goal FOR the Predators.</p>
<p>I know, it seems like you are all about taking pot shots, but it&#8217;s ok.  We&#8217;ll see come playoff time who&#8217;s left standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12352&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12352</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12352</guid>
		<description>Jonesey, I&#039;m fully aware of that, and I was expecting someone to mis-read what I said. What I wrote is, &quot;Radulov celebrated as though he’d scored a playoff series-clinching goal (something no one wearing a Predators jersey has ever done, by the way).&quot; Read it carefully. It&#039;s a true statement. 

Anyone on that team who has scored a playoff-clinching goal was wearing a different jersey, not that yellow/silver/black monstrosity. That was my point. It was a shot at the Preds&#039; lack of any real playoff history. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonesey, I&#8217;m fully aware of that, and I was expecting someone to mis-read what I said. What I wrote is, &#8220;Radulov celebrated as though he’d scored a playoff series-clinching goal (something no one wearing a Predators jersey has ever done, by the way).&#8221; Read it carefully. It&#8217;s a true statement. </p>
<p>Anyone on that team who has scored a playoff-clinching goal was wearing a different jersey, not that yellow/silver/black monstrosity. That was my point. It was a shot at the Preds&#8217; lack of any real playoff history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonesey</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12350&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12350</guid>
		<description>Just so you know, I&#039;m pretty sure Jason Arnott has scored a playoff series clinching goal.  maybe Kariya has too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, I&#8217;m pretty sure Jason Arnott has scored a playoff series clinching goal.  maybe Kariya has too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12349&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12349</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12349</guid>
		<description>What, you&#039;re surprised that I saw the game differently than you? Notice the red and white color scheme of this site. You&#039;ll not see any baby-crap yellow here, bud, unless it&#039;s a picture of Jordin Tootoo getting laid out or beat down. Take off those tinted glasses and tell me what you thought of the officiating, et al. as a hockey fan. 

I don&#039;t appreciate being called a homer, by the way, because anyone who&#039;s read this blog for any length of time knows I have a lot of negative things to say about the Wings when they screw up. I strive to have an open mind about the Wings and the game, but if you think I&#039;m going to let bad officiating or Jordin Tootoo slide, you&#039;ve got another thing coming. 

I&#039;ve been a fan long enough to be entitled to my opinion on the game, which have been recorded here for almost four years now. What are your credentials and what&#039;s your name, &lt;em&gt;Anonymous&lt;/em&gt;? Hiding behind anonymity makes it that much easier to buy into stereotypes about Predators fans. Why not set me straight by actually using an argument rather than calling me names?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, you&#8217;re surprised that I saw the game differently than you? Notice the red and white color scheme of this site. You&#8217;ll not see any baby-crap yellow here, bud, unless it&#8217;s a picture of Jordin Tootoo getting laid out or beat down. Take off those tinted glasses and tell me what you thought of the officiating, et al. as a hockey fan. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t appreciate being called a homer, by the way, because anyone who&#8217;s read this blog for any length of time knows I have a lot of negative things to say about the Wings when they screw up. I strive to have an open mind about the Wings and the game, but if you think I&#8217;m going to let bad officiating or Jordin Tootoo slide, you&#8217;ve got another thing coming. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan long enough to be entitled to my opinion on the game, which have been recorded here for almost four years now. What are your credentials and what&#8217;s your name, <em>Anonymous</em>? Hiding behind anonymity makes it that much easier to buy into stereotypes about Predators fans. Why not set me straight by actually using an argument rather than calling me names?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basher</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fwings-5-preds-2%2F%23comment-12348&amp;seed_title=Wings+5%2C+Preds+2/comment-page-1/#comment-12348</link>
		<dc:creator>basher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/03/14/wings-5-preds-2/#comment-12348</guid>
		<description>You are a douche.  Homer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a douche.  Homer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

