<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wings 4, Blackhawks 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9258&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9258</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9258</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they definitely won&#039;t get so much time once Zetterberg&#039;s back, and it&#039;ll go even lower once all the forwards are healthy (if such a time comes). They&#039;re getting valuable experience, though, and will benefit from being with such a deep team, even if kind of sucks for them now. Down the road, they should be be the ones logging the big minutes.

Yeah, it&#039;ll be interesting to see how the team does with so many youngsters on the roster. 

I think 5&#039;9&quot; might be stretching it a bit.... It &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a sight, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they definitely won&#8217;t get so much time once Zetterberg&#8217;s back, and it&#8217;ll go even lower once all the forwards are healthy (if such a time comes). They&#8217;re getting valuable experience, though, and will benefit from being with such a deep team, even if kind of sucks for them now. Down the road, they should be be the ones logging the big minutes.</p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how the team does with so many youngsters on the roster. </p>
<p>I think 5&#8242;9&#8243; might be stretching it a bit&#8230;. It <i>was</i> a sight, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9245&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9245</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9245</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure once Zetterberg gets back their time will drop again, but it&#039;s so nice to hear they got it and even more that they worked with it, obviously, considering the results.  I like the sounds of those lines though.  Although I can&#039;t help but laugh at that our Young Guns line is all split up and yet we now have a line full of kids even younger - at least in terms of NHL experience.

I am really sad I missed that though - little 5&#039;9&quot; Jiri defending Kris Draper of all people would have been quite the sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure once Zetterberg gets back their time will drop again, but it&#8217;s so nice to hear they got it and even more that they worked with it, obviously, considering the results.  I like the sounds of those lines though.  Although I can&#8217;t help but laugh at that our Young Guns line is all split up and yet we now have a line full of kids even younger &#8211; at least in terms of NHL experience.</p>
<p>I am really sad I missed that though &#8211; little 5&#8242;9&#8243; Jiri defending Kris Draper of all people would have been quite the sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9151&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9151</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9151</guid>
		<description>Steph, 

I agree. It was a long time coming and is probably only temporary, but it was definitely good to see those two on the ice so much.

The lines were, generally, 

Holmstrom-Datsyuk-Filppula
Calder-Lang-Franzen
Maltby-Draper-Hudler
Hussey-Ellis-Langfeld

You would have liked to have seen Hudler defending Kris Draper  after James Wisniewski roughed him up. He waded in like some 6&#039;2&quot; enforcer, looking seriously pissed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph, </p>
<p>I agree. It was a long time coming and is probably only temporary, but it was definitely good to see those two on the ice so much.</p>
<p>The lines were, generally, </p>
<p>Holmstrom-Datsyuk-Filppula<br />
Calder-Lang-Franzen<br />
Maltby-Draper-Hudler<br />
Hussey-Ellis-Langfeld</p>
<p>You would have liked to have seen Hudler defending Kris Draper  after James Wisniewski roughed him up. He waded in like some 6&#8242;2&#8243; enforcer, looking seriously pissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9150&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9150</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9150</guid>
		<description>I missed this whole game thanks to class, but I&#039;m glad to see Calder step up - let&#039;s hope it stays that way.

Equally glad to see the ice time Filppula and Hudler got so much ice time.  As much as I love Pavel and Hank, it&#039;s good to see other players getting relied on a little more lately, especially when we&#039;ve looked like such a one-line team - how were they mixing up the lines with the addition of Calder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed this whole game thanks to class, but I&#8217;m glad to see Calder step up &#8211; let&#8217;s hope it stays that way.</p>
<p>Equally glad to see the ice time Filppula and Hudler got so much ice time.  As much as I love Pavel and Hank, it&#8217;s good to see other players getting relied on a little more lately, especially when we&#8217;ve looked like such a one-line team &#8211; how were they mixing up the lines with the addition of Calder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9148&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9148</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9148</guid>
		<description>Yeah, let&#039;s hope that scoring on his first shift is his only similarity to Cory Cross. 

I meant the second line as a whole had four points, and its members were plus-5 combined. 

Thanks for reminding me about &lt;em&gt;Calder&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s number. I did mean to mention it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, let&#8217;s hope that scoring on his first shift is his only similarity to Cory Cross. </p>
<p>I meant the second line as a whole had four points, and its members were plus-5 combined. </p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me about <em>Calder</em>&#8217;s number. I did mean to mention it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2007%2F02%2F28%2Fwings-4-blackhawks-1%2F%23comment-9147&amp;seed_title=Wings+4%2C+Blackhawks+1/comment-page-1/#comment-9147</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/02/28/wings-4-blackhawks-1/#comment-9147</guid>
		<description>Cory Cross also scored a goal on his very first shift and shot as a Red Wing last year. But let&#039;s hope Calder&#039;s stay in Detroit goes better than Cross&#039;s.

I think you meant  2, not  5. It was nice to see him get 2 points, and it would&#039;ve been nice if his goal had stood up to be the GWG. I really hope I&#039;m wrong about him and that he can be a very productive member of the Red Wings. It has only been one game so far though, so let&#039;s wait and see. Hopefully Cleary and Franzen can develop some offensive chemistry.

I was pretty disappointed that we let in a goal with one minute to go in the game. The extra fantasy points from a shutout would&#039;ve helped. It was also somewhat surprising to see such a weak game from the Hawks, especially after they just beat the Blues 5-1. They usually play a good game against the Wings, no matter how bad they&#039;re doing. Part of it was probably due to Havlat missing the game due to the flu though. If he&#039;s back by Friday it should be a better game. Also, we really need a guy who can fight. Someone better than Brad Norton. I wonder if Bertuzzi will be willing to drop the gloves if the need arises once he&#039;s able to play. *Insert Bertuzzi sucker punching joke here*

PS - You didn&#039;t mention it, but Cleary wore #17.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory Cross also scored a goal on his very first shift and shot as a Red Wing last year. But let&#8217;s hope Calder&#8217;s stay in Detroit goes better than Cross&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I think you meant  2, not  5. It was nice to see him get 2 points, and it would&#8217;ve been nice if his goal had stood up to be the GWG. I really hope I&#8217;m wrong about him and that he can be a very productive member of the Red Wings. It has only been one game so far though, so let&#8217;s wait and see. Hopefully Cleary and Franzen can develop some offensive chemistry.</p>
<p>I was pretty disappointed that we let in a goal with one minute to go in the game. The extra fantasy points from a shutout would&#8217;ve helped. It was also somewhat surprising to see such a weak game from the Hawks, especially after they just beat the Blues 5-1. They usually play a good game against the Wings, no matter how bad they&#8217;re doing. Part of it was probably due to Havlat missing the game due to the flu though. If he&#8217;s back by Friday it should be a better game. Also, we really need a guy who can fight. Someone better than Brad Norton. I wonder if Bertuzzi will be willing to drop the gloves if the need arises once he&#8217;s able to play. *Insert Bertuzzi sucker punching joke here*</p>
<p>PS &#8211; You didn&#8217;t mention it, but Cleary wore #17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

