Update (25. Feb, 1:53 PM): Joffrey Lupul has been quoted in the Edmonton Sun as saying he thought the Kronwall hit was borderline dirty, but said he wasn’t going to complain. By contrast, his head coach, Craig McTavish told the paper,
“People have long memories at this level and it’s not something we’ll quickly forget. He’s got a history of that. When you blindside guys like that viciously, that says something and we’ll remember it.”
“He’s got a history of that”? When, pray tell, has Kronwall given a guy a concussion with a shoulder-to-head hit before, McTavish? It was not vicious, it was just unfortunate timing and placement. If you want a suspension because it was a headshot, say that, but don’t spew that kind of whining crap. - Matt
Update (9:47 PM): I’m obviously not the only one who wants the League to rethink their policy on hits to the head, but I think this is the first time a person in authority has spoken out against it.
The recent Senators/Sabres conflagration was kick started by a headshot on Chris Drury by Ottawa’s Chris Neil. Drury is out with a serious concussion now and Buffalo’s owner has written a letter to the NHL asking for change.
Neil’s hit was far more malicious than Kronwall’s hit, so the fact that he went unpunished is far more telling than the fact that Nik didn’t for his check, which didn’t demonstrate an intent to injure. - Matt
Someone has YouTubed a video of Niklas Kronwall’s hit on Joffrey Lupul. Dirty or not dirty? See for yourself.
Call me biased all you want, but I say more ill-advised than dirty. It was all shoulder and, though he did power through it with his legs, it wasn’t malicious and it would have just been a big open ice hit had Lupul not just dished off the puck and looked away.
Still, at the risk of being called a Red Wings heretic (but I’d rather be wrongly accused of being a heretic than rightly accused of being a hypocrite), I will say that it was not a safe hit or a smart hit, and almost certainly one deserving of a suspension as a head-shot. However, the League doesn’t punish hits to the head because of an irrational and ridiculous fear that it would make the game less physical. Like I wrote in November, I think it’s criminal of the League not to police hits like that more, regardless of whether or not a Red Wing is delivering them, and regardless of intent. Hits to the head should not go unpunished, period.



A little explanition of the MacTavish quote: Craig MacTavish is a whiny little girl. Every postgame press conference I’ve ever heard him give had him complaning about how the Oilers were screwed over by (or won inspite of) a missed call, or wrongly dissallowed goal, ect…
Oh, I know, I know. That’s why his quote makes me so mad, because that’s all it is, whining. It’s not a real complaint and the fact that he’s trying to pin Kronwall as a dirty player using one of his whiny rants really ticks me off.
MacTavish is a bitch. I wonder if anyone - other than Edmonton media and fans of course - takes him seriously. I didn’t see him whining the way he is now when Raffi Torres took out Williams with a hit to the head.
You also didn’t see Babcock saying anything about the Torres hit, which is another topic for another time….
Yeah, the hypocrisy of MacTavish is staggering. Torres’ hit was far more dangerous and malicious, but to him, it was probably just Torres finishing a check. Which is what Kronwall was doing.