<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wings 2, Habs 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-54178</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/15/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-54178</guid>
		<description>I came here by accident, but just might stay :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here by accident, but just might stay <img src='http://onthewingsblog.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Montreal (13-9-4, 30 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-42469</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Montreal (13-9-4, 30 Pts) 7:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/15/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-42469</guid>
		<description>[...] two Original Six teams this season. The teams met  once last year as well, with the Wings winning 2-0 on January [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two Original Six teams this season. The teams met  once last year as well, with the Wings winning 2-0 on January [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ Columbus (17-25-5, 39 Pts) 7:00 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6822</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ Columbus (17-25-5, 39 Pts) 7:00 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/15/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6822</guid>
		<description>[...] The Wings are riding a five-game win streak, having beaten Colorado, Phoenix, Chicago, Montreal, and Nashville in that span. Tonight&#8217;s game kicks off a stretch of three road games in which they&#8217;ll head to Colorado tomorrow before coming home for the All Star Break. Then, they&#8217;ll head to St. Louis to play the Blues a week from today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Wings are riding a five-game win streak, having beaten Colorado, Phoenix, Chicago, Montreal, and Nashville in that span. Tonight&#8217;s game kicks off a stretch of three road games in which they&#8217;ll head to Colorado tomorrow before coming home for the All Star Break. Then, they&#8217;ll head to St. Louis to play the Blues a week from today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6775</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/15/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6775</guid>
		<description>Justin, I didn't catch the number of the player at the time, but I checked ESPN this morning and &lt;a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nhl/boxscore?gameId=270115005" rel="nofollow"&gt;their boxscore&lt;/a&gt; says it was Ryder. 

Either way, it's a shock to me that the refs didn't see it as a dive. With that and the Markov penalty non-call you cite, they must have had momentary blindness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I didn&#8217;t catch the number of the player at the time, but I checked ESPN this morning and <a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nhl/boxscore?gameId=270115005" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/scores.espn.go.com');">their boxscore</a> says it was Ryder. </p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s a shock to me that the refs didn&#8217;t see it as a dive. With that and the Markov penalty non-call you cite, they must have had momentary blindness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/16/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2007/01/15/wings-2-habs-0/#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure that was Andrei Markov, not Michael Ryder, who faked the high stick. While a hooking call would have been completely justifiable, it was BS that Markov got away with such a blatant dive. (And Markov is a known diver.) Couple that with the fact that Markov had moments ago gotten away with a penalty of his own, and you have to wonder what the refs were thinking during those 20 seconds or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that was Andrei Markov, not Michael Ryder, who faked the high stick. While a hooking call would have been completely justifiable, it was BS that Markov got away with such a blatant dive. (And Markov is a known diver.) Couple that with the fact that Markov had moments ago gotten away with a penalty of his own, and you have to wonder what the refs were thinking during those 20 seconds or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.331 seconds -->
