<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robbed again: Wings 2, Sharks 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/</link>
	<description>by true Citizens of Hockeytown</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GameDay: @ San Jose (26-14-0, 52 Pts) 10:30 ET at On the Wings</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>GameDay: @ San Jose (26-14-0, 52 Pts) 10:30 ET at On the Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>[...] Tonight is the fourth and final game between these two teams this season. The Sharks lead the series 2-1, with wins coming on October 19th (5-1) and December 2nd (3-2). The Wings won the October 25th meeting 2-1 in Detroit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tonight is the fourth and final game between these two teams this season. The Sharks lead the series 2-1, with wins coming on October 19th (5-1) and December 2nd (3-2). The Wings won the October 25th meeting 2-1 in Detroit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Saler</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Saler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>What boggles my mind is that the NHL seems to think the Holmstrom call &lt;a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061204.WBhockeyblog20061204141302/WBStory/WBhockeyblog/" rel="nofollow"&gt;was a good one&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;“We’ve handed out lots of (goaltender interference) penalties this year and we’ve taken down goals when it’s clear goalies have been tampered with,” Murphy said, using Red Wings forward Tomas Holmstrom’s disallowed goal Saturday against San Jose as an example.

“We’ve always maintained goaltenders should be free to do their job ‘in the blue’ (i.e., the crease), and that’s something (director of officiating) Stephen Walkom emphasizes with the officials on a weekly, even daily basis.”&lt;/blockquote&gt; What a load of BS. 

You're exactly right, Firebird. A replay system may slow the game down but it should result in fair calls as compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What boggles my mind is that the NHL seems to think the Holmstrom call <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061204.WBhockeyblog20061204141302/WBStory/WBhockeyblog/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.theglobeandmail.com');">was a good one</a>:<br />
<blockquote>“We’ve handed out lots of (goaltender interference) penalties this year and we’ve taken down goals when it’s clear goalies have been tampered with,” Murphy said, using Red Wings forward Tomas Holmstrom’s disallowed goal Saturday against San Jose as an example.</p>
<p>“We’ve always maintained goaltenders should be free to do their job ‘in the blue’ (i.e., the crease), and that’s something (director of officiating) Stephen Walkom emphasizes with the officials on a weekly, even daily basis.”</p></blockquote>
<p> What a load of BS. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re exactly right, Firebird. A replay system may slow the game down but it should result in fair calls as compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebird_995</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>firebird_995</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that they should be able to take replays up to the booth.  There was nothing wrong with that goal.  I remember when I first started watching hockey that if a foot was in the crease, contact or no contact, the goal was disallowed...But didn't they fix that rule?  Didn't they change it so that contact WOULD have to happen for the goal to be disallowed?  I think that's what I remember...but with the "new" NHL maybe they changed the rules back or something.  But still, Holmstrom was NOT in the crease and the only contact was Toskala ON Holmstrom, not Holmstrom on Toskala.  That goal should have stood.

In order to fix that problem...I also remember back in the day that the refs would go over to that little spot by the penalty box, where a guy would hand them a phone through a little hole in the glass.  On the other end of that phone would be a little guy in the video review booth that would confirm or overrule calls.  I don't see that anymore...What happened to that system?  

Also, I'm not sure, but I do know that in football the coaches can challenge plays (like 2 challenges or something and they take that out of the timeouts...) I think it would be great if they did this for Hockey as well (if they don't have that already...but I imagine if they did then Babcock would have done it.)  I remember them saying that plays that "went up to the booth take too much time out of the game.  It's not fair for the fans" or something that that.  However, fans don't deserve an unfair call.  The deserve a fair game, and they shouldn't have a problem if it only takes five minutes or less to do.  So I say we should combine the "going to the booth" rule and the "challenge" rule.

-firebird995</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that they should be able to take replays up to the booth.  There was nothing wrong with that goal.  I remember when I first started watching hockey that if a foot was in the crease, contact or no contact, the goal was disallowed&#8230;But didn&#8217;t they fix that rule?  Didn&#8217;t they change it so that contact WOULD have to happen for the goal to be disallowed?  I think that&#8217;s what I remember&#8230;but with the &#8220;new&#8221; NHL maybe they changed the rules back or something.  But still, Holmstrom was NOT in the crease and the only contact was Toskala ON Holmstrom, not Holmstrom on Toskala.  That goal should have stood.</p>
<p>In order to fix that problem&#8230;I also remember back in the day that the refs would go over to that little spot by the penalty box, where a guy would hand them a phone through a little hole in the glass.  On the other end of that phone would be a little guy in the video review booth that would confirm or overrule calls.  I don&#8217;t see that anymore&#8230;What happened to that system?  </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure, but I do know that in football the coaches can challenge plays (like 2 challenges or something and they take that out of the timeouts&#8230;) I think it would be great if they did this for Hockey as well (if they don&#8217;t have that already&#8230;but I imagine if they did then Babcock would have done it.)  I remember them saying that plays that &#8220;went up to the booth take too much time out of the game.  It&#8217;s not fair for the fans&#8221; or something that that.  However, fans don&#8217;t deserve an unfair call.  The deserve a fair game, and they shouldn&#8217;t have a problem if it only takes five minutes or less to do.  So I say we should combine the &#8220;going to the booth&#8221; rule and the &#8220;challenge&#8221; rule.</p>
<p>-firebird995</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/12/03/robbed-again-wings-2-sharks-3/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Joey McDonald won that game for them, and they still managed to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey McDonald won that game for them, and they still managed to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.301 seconds -->
