Comments on: GameDay: @ Chicago (4-8-0, 8 Pts) 8:30 ET http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/11/02/gameday-chicago-4-8-0-8-pts-830-et/ by true Citizens of Hockeytown Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:13:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Matt Saler http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/11/02/gameday-chicago-4-8-0-8-pts-830-et/#comment-954 Matt Saler Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:11:51 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/11/02/gameday-chicago-4-8-0-8-pts-830-et/#comment-954 "Havlat’s injury is to his ankle, not knee, and it was in the 7th game." Sorry about that. I do remember that it was his ankle now that you mention it. Dumb mistake on my part, as with the game number. Yes, I think Handzus is worth a mention, but I forgot to mention him. “Havlat’s injury is to his ankle, not knee, and it was in the 7th game.”

Sorry about that. I do remember that it was his ankle now that you mention it. Dumb mistake on my part, as with the game number.

Yes, I think Handzus is worth a mention, but I forgot to mention him.

]]> By: jz http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/11/02/gameday-chicago-4-8-0-8-pts-830-et/#comment-953 jz Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:00:00 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/2006/11/02/gameday-chicago-4-8-0-8-pts-830-et/#comment-953 Havlat's injury is to his ankle, not knee, and it was in the 7th game. You don't think Handzus is worth mention? Boucher has actually played quite well the past couple of games, despite the losses. Havlat’s injury is to his ankle, not knee, and it was in the 7th game. You don’t think Handzus is worth mention?

Boucher has actually played quite well the past couple of games, despite the losses.

]]>