Comments on: Wings 6, Flyers 3 http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2006%2F01%2F12%2Fwings-6-flyers-3%2F%23comment-&seed_title=Wings+6%2C+Flyers+3 by true Citizens of Hockeytown Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:07:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Wings 7, Flames 4 at On the Wings http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2006%2F01%2F12%2Fwings-6-flyers-3%2F%23comment-7349&seed_title=Wings+6%2C+Flyers+3/comment-page-1/#comment-7349 Wings 7, Flames 4 at On the Wings Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:43:13 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/?p=1056#comment-7349 [...] the Flyers for the only time this season. The Wings won the last meeting between the two teams, 6-3 on January 12th, [...] [...] the Flyers for the only time this season. The Wings won the last meeting between the two teams, 6-3 on January 12th, [...]

]]> By: Brian List http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2006%2F01%2F12%2Fwings-6-flyers-3%2F%23comment-393&seed_title=Wings+6%2C+Flyers+3/comment-page-1/#comment-393 Brian List Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:54:00 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/?p=1056#comment-393 Check this out: http://www.letsgowings.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=32698 Apparently the fantasy hockey people over at letsgowings.com are getting fed up with this stats screw-up. Check this out:

http://www.letsgowings.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=32698

Apparently the fantasy hockey people over at letsgowings.com are getting fed up with this stats screw-up.

]]> By: Brian List http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2006%2F01%2F12%2Fwings-6-flyers-3%2F%23comment-392&seed_title=Wings+6%2C+Flyers+3/comment-page-1/#comment-392 Brian List Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:50:00 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/?p=1056#comment-392 Zetterberg's second goal was definitely not unassisted. And Maltby never played on a line with Shanahan or Zetterberg, so it was impossible for him to have scored that goal. It was definitely Datsyuk's goal. I take it some dude on nhl.com got it wrong and everyone else followed suit. Mistook #13 for #18. Zetterberg’s second goal was definitely not unassisted.

And Maltby never played on a line with Shanahan or Zetterberg, so it was impossible for him to have scored that goal. It was definitely Datsyuk’s goal. I take it some dude on nhl.com got it wrong and everyone else followed suit. Mistook #13 for #18.

]]> By: Anonymous http://onthewingsblog.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fonthewingsblog.com%2F2006%2F01%2F12%2Fwings-6-flyers-3%2F%23comment-391&seed_title=Wings+6%2C+Flyers+3/comment-page-1/#comment-391 Anonymous Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:30:00 +0000 http://onthewingsblog.com/?p=1056#comment-391 I also saw the game, and you state that Datsyuk had a total of four points...I agreed, he got the first goal, the forth goal (amazing move), and he set up Zetterberg twice...But other sources (Yahoo, NHL.com, Sportsline) have him only down for 2 points, the first goal and assisting only one of Zetterberg's goal. The third period goal was given to Maltby, and Zetterberg's second goal was claimed unassisted. So, did Datsyuk have a two or four point night? I also saw the game, and you state that Datsyuk had a total of four points…I agreed, he got the first goal, the forth goal (amazing move), and he set up Zetterberg twice…But other sources (Yahoo, NHL.com, Sportsline) have him only down for 2 points, the first goal and assisting only one of Zetterberg’s goal. The third period goal was given to Maltby, and Zetterberg’s second goal was claimed unassisted.

So, did Datsyuk have a two or four point night?

]]>